Australian vs Finnish Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 201,354,457 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Finns within Australian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.316. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Australians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.098% in Finns. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Australians corresponds to an increase of 97.7 Finns.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Australian and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,074 compared to $43,461, a difference of 19.8%), median household income ($96,490 compared to $83,607, a difference of 15.4%), and median family income ($118,440 compared to $102,676, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 1.5%), householder income under 25 years ($53,739 compared to $51,827, a difference of 3.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($66,891 compared to $59,535, a difference of 12.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Australian and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (15.7% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 7.8%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.8% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 7.7%), and single male poverty (12.6% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among girls under 16 (14.8% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 0.020%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.8% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 0.030%), and poverty (11.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.20%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Australian and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 14.0%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 11.1%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.2% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.030%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.45%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.79%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Australian and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.8% compared to 43.9%, a difference of 16.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.060%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 0.080%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.43%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Australian and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 10.4%), births to unmarried women (29.5% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 7.2%), and divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.8% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 1.0%), family households with children (26.9% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and average family size (3.13 compared to 3.09, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Australian and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 31.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 11.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 2.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 60.3%, a difference of 6.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 10.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Australian and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.9% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 41.1%), doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 31.9%), and master's degree (18.4% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 29.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (88.1% compared to 88.2%, a difference of 0.14%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.18%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.18%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Australian and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 16.4%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 15.5%), and disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.7% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 1.4%), cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 2.4%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 3.1%).