Australian vs Cambodian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 81,051,516 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Cambodians within Australian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.433. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Australians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.309% in Cambodians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Australians corresponds to an increase of 308.8 Cambodians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Australian and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 9.0%), median female earnings ($43,308 compared to $45,014, a difference of 3.9%), and householder income under 25 years ($53,739 compared to $55,571, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($66,891 compared to $66,892, a difference of 0.0%), median household income ($96,490 compared to $96,324, a difference of 0.17%), and median male earnings ($62,857 compared to $62,516, a difference of 0.55%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Australian and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 9.0%), child poverty under the age of 5 (15.5% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 7.6%), and single male poverty (12.6% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (7.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 0.070%), male poverty (10.4% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 0.30%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (14.4% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 0.46%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Australian and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 22.4%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 14.3%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.5% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.6% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 0.11%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 0.19%), and female unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.25%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Australian and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 67.4%, a difference of 3.3%), in labor force | age 16-19 (37.8% compared to 37.0%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.5% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 75.2%, a difference of 0.47%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Australian and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.5% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 10.7%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 10.4%), and divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.13 compared to 3.15, a difference of 0.67%), currently married (47.6% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 1.2%), and family households with children (26.9% compared to 26.5%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Australian and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 19.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 13.2%), and no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 0.95%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 53.3%, a difference of 6.4%), and no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 8.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Australian and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 17.5%), master's degree (18.4% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 8.7%), and bachelor's degree (44.0% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (88.1% compared to 88.2%, a difference of 0.12%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.30%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.30%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Australian and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 19.5%), hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 11.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.7% compared to 46.1%, a difference of 0.94%), cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 1.1%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.0% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 1.2%).