Australian vs Ugandan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 73,093,744 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Ugandans within Australian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.119. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Australians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.018% in Ugandans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Australians corresponds to an increase of 17.6 Ugandans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Australian and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 24.1%, a difference of 17.1%), per capita income ($52,074 compared to $45,047, a difference of 15.6%), and median male earnings ($62,857 compared to $55,290, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,739 compared to $50,923, a difference of 5.5%), median female earnings ($43,308 compared to $40,889, a difference of 5.9%), and median earnings ($52,294 compared to $47,854, a difference of 9.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Australian and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 27.2%), married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 23.8%), and family poverty (7.8% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (28.3% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 1.9%), single female poverty (20.3% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 2.3%), and single male poverty (12.6% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Australian and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.5% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 41.1%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 14.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.2% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 2.3%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.5%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Australian and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 67.4%, a difference of 3.2%), in labor force | age 16-19 (37.8% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.5% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 0.20%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 0.84%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Australian and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 16.6%), married-couple households (47.4% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 8.0%), and currently married (47.6% compared to 44.2%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 0.86%), family households (62.8% compared to 61.7%, a difference of 1.8%), and births to unmarried women (29.5% compared to 30.1%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Australian and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 14.6%), no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 13.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 1.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 53.5%, a difference of 6.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 13.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Australian and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 26.7%), professional degree (5.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 15.1%), and bachelor's degree (44.0% compared to 40.8%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.46%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.46%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.47%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Australian and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 21.4%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 11.8%), and hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (11.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.49%), ambulatory disability (5.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 0.50%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 1.1%).