Australian vs Lebanese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 200,689,509 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Lebanese within Australian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.591. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Australians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.207% in Lebanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Australians corresponds to an increase of 207.1 Lebanese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Australian and Lebanese communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,074 compared to $45,840, a difference of 13.6%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($107,912 compared to $97,339, a difference of 10.9%), and median family income ($118,440 compared to $107,086, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 1.1%), householder income under 25 years ($53,739 compared to $50,355, a difference of 6.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($66,891 compared to $62,287, a difference of 7.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Australian and Lebanese communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 25.1%), receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 15.6%), and family poverty (7.8% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (20.3% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 2.1%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.8% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 2.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.5% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Australian and Lebanese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.5% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 11.4%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 8.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 0.070%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.6%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Australian and Lebanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.8% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 2.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.81%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.5% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 0.040%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 0.26%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 0.56%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Australian and Lebanese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 5.6%), family households with children (26.9% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 3.1%), and family households (62.8% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.020%), births to unmarried women (29.5% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 0.050%), and currently married (47.6% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 0.67%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Australian and Lebanese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 16.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 3.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 57.6%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 0.47%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 1.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 57.6%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Australian and Lebanese communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 17.1%), doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 16.8%), and no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.27%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.28%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.28%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Australian and Lebanese communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 6.3%), ambulatory disability (5.8% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 5.3%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 0.77%), cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 1.0%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 1.1%).