Australian vs Immigrants from Oceania Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 192,719,729 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania within Australian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.814. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Australians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.713% in Immigrants from Oceania. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Australians corresponds to an increase of 712.7 Immigrants from Oceania.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Australian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,074 compared to $45,220, a difference of 15.2%), median male earnings ($62,857 compared to $55,712, a difference of 12.8%), and median family income ($118,440 compared to $106,453, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,739 compared to $53,680, a difference of 0.11%), householder income over 65 years ($66,891 compared to $64,416, a difference of 3.8%), and median female earnings ($43,308 compared to $40,297, a difference of 7.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Australian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 18.3%), married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 16.5%), and family poverty (7.8% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (28.3% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 1.4%), single female poverty (20.3% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 1.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.5% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Australian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 7.5%), unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 6.9%), and male unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 0.14%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.2% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 0.23%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Australian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.85%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 0.79%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 0.26%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 0.29%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (37.8% compared to 37.9%, a difference of 0.32%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Australian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 13.0%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 12.7%), and average family size (3.13 compared to 3.29, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.34%), married-couple households (47.4% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 0.93%), and currently married (47.6% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Australian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 16.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 8.5%), and no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 0.36%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 1.5%), and no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Australian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 38.7%), professional degree (5.9% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 28.8%), and doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 25.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.64%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.65%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.65%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Australian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 18.8%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.0% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 8.8%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 0.53%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and male disability (11.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 1.4%).