Australian vs Asian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 223,290,127 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Asians within Australian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.223. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Australians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.670% in Asians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Australians corresponds to a decrease of 670.0 Asians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Australian and Asian communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($53,739 compared to $57,003, a difference of 6.1%), median household income ($96,490 compared to $101,681, a difference of 5.4%), and wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($118,440 compared to $119,955, a difference of 1.3%), median male earnings ($62,857 compared to $63,827, a difference of 1.5%), and median earnings ($52,294 compared to $53,690, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Australian and Asian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.8% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 14.2%), single male poverty (12.6% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 12.9%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.8% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 0.62%), family poverty (7.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 1.2%), and male poverty (10.4% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Australian and Asian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 8.0%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.5% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 7.1%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.6% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.060%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.11%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 0.27%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Australian and Asian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.8% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 10.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.040%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.070%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.47%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Australian and Asian communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 11.8%), births to unmarried women (29.5% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 10.3%), and family households with children (26.9% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (5.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.37%), currently married (47.6% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 1.7%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Australian and Asian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 12.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 7.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 57.0%, a difference of 0.54%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 91.1%, a difference of 1.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Australian and Asian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 48.3%), professional degree (5.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 6.9%), and high school diploma (91.2% compared to 89.4%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of master's degree (18.4% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 0.27%), associate's degree (51.9% compared to 52.1%, a difference of 0.45%), and college, 1 year or more (64.6% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 0.62%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Australian and Asian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 27.2%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 16.0%), and hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 15.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 1.1%), cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 2.5%), and disability age over 75 (45.7% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 2.8%).