Australian vs Immigrants from Uruguay Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,459,110 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uruguay within Australian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.050. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Australians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Immigrants from Uruguay. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Australians corresponds to a decrease of 3.2 Immigrants from Uruguay.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Australian and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($118,440 compared to $98,205, a difference of 20.6%), median male earnings ($62,857 compared to $52,860, a difference of 18.9%), and per capita income ($52,074 compared to $43,997, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,739 compared to $52,302, a difference of 2.8%), median female earnings ($43,308 compared to $38,945, a difference of 11.2%), and wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 14.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Australian and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 32.5%), receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 30.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.9% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 28.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.7% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 0.94%), single female poverty (20.3% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and single mother poverty (28.3% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Australian and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 16.4%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 13.9%), and female unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.44%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.79%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Australian and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.8% compared to 34.4%, a difference of 9.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.33%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.38%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Australian and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 20.9%), births to unmarried women (29.5% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 14.8%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.8% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 1.7%), family households with children (26.9% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 1.7%), and average family size (3.13 compared to 3.23, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Australian and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 21.2%), no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 18.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 88.1%, a difference of 2.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 51.4%, a difference of 10.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 17.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Australian and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 43.8%), doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 42.3%), and professional degree (5.9% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 29.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.76%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.77%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.78%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Australian and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 15.3%), disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 12.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (11.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.13%), cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 1.2%), and disability age over 75 (45.7% compared to 46.4%, a difference of 1.7%).