Australian vs Canadian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 209,654,816 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Canadians within Australian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.698. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Australians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.384% in Canadians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Australians corresponds to an increase of 384.2 Canadians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Australian and Canadian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,074 compared to $45,858, a difference of 13.6%), median family income ($118,440 compared to $106,597, a difference of 11.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($107,912 compared to $97,625, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 0.090%), householder income under 25 years ($53,739 compared to $52,336, a difference of 2.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($66,891 compared to $62,230, a difference of 7.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Australian and Canadian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 9.6%), single father poverty (15.7% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 8.7%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (15.5% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.9% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 0.16%), male poverty (10.4% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 1.1%), and poverty (11.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Australian and Canadian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.5% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 10.9%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 10.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 0.45%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.67%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.97%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Australian and Canadian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.8% compared to 40.1%, a difference of 6.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.5% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 0.090%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.13%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.24%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Australian and Canadian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.5% compared to 31.9%, a difference of 8.1%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 6.3%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.13 compared to 3.14, a difference of 0.14%), family households with children (26.9% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 0.59%), and currently married (47.6% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Australian and Canadian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 21.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 4.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 2.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 3.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Australian and Canadian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 25.9%), doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 20.4%), and master's degree (18.4% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.050%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.050%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.050%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Australian and Canadian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 10.2%), ambulatory disability (5.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 9.2%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 2.0%), disability age over 75 (45.7% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 2.0%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.0% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 4.1%).