Australian vs Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 127,538,241 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago within Australian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.127. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Australians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.020% in Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Australians corresponds to an increase of 19.6 Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Australian and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 45.7%), median family income ($118,440 compared to $93,988, a difference of 26.0%), and per capita income ($52,074 compared to $41,476, a difference of 25.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,739 compared to $52,437, a difference of 2.5%), median female earnings ($43,308 compared to $40,895, a difference of 5.9%), and median earnings ($52,294 compared to $45,729, a difference of 14.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Australian and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 64.1%), married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 47.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.9% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 42.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.6% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 2.2%), single female poverty (20.3% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 2.9%), and single mother poverty (28.3% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Australian and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.6% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 34.4%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.2% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 34.2%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.9% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 33.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 3.1%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 4.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Australian and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.8% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 25.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 6.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.10%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.5% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 0.69%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 0.73%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Australian and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 36.5%), births to unmarried women (29.5% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 22.9%), and married-couple households (47.4% compared to 41.2%, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 0.50%), family households (62.8% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 2.1%), and family households with children (26.9% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Australian and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 144.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 59.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 50.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 76.8%, a difference of 17.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 40.3%, a difference of 40.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 50.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Australian and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 63.0%), doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 62.4%), and professional degree (5.9% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 51.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Australian and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 27.2%), disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 22.0%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (11.5% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 1.3%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 1.8%), and cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 2.4%).