Australian vs Immigrants from Lithuania Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 88,474,870 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Lithuania within Australian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.182. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Australians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.016% in Immigrants from Lithuania. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Australians corresponds to a decrease of 16.1 Immigrants from Lithuania.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Australian and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($53,739 compared to $55,028, a difference of 2.4%), wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 1.5%), and per capita income ($52,074 compared to $51,361, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($43,308 compared to $43,317, a difference of 0.020%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($107,912 compared to $108,149, a difference of 0.22%), and median family income ($118,440 compared to $118,053, a difference of 0.33%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Australian and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.8% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 19.3%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.8% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 14.9%), and single female poverty (20.3% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 0.19%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.9% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 2.7%), and single father poverty (15.7% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Australian and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.6% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 6.2%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 5.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.15%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 0.37%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.5% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 0.43%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Australian and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (82.5% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 1.6%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (37.8% compared to 37.2%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 0.49%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.70%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 0.79%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Australian and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 15.4%), births to unmarried women (29.5% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 6.5%), and single mother households (5.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.9% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 0.47%), average family size (3.13 compared to 3.15, a difference of 0.69%), and family households (62.8% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Australian and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 16.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 8.9%), and no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 0.24%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 55.8%, a difference of 1.5%), and no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Australian and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 8.5%), professional degree (5.9% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 5.6%), and no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (64.6% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 0.020%), 11th grade (94.1% compared to 94.1%, a difference of 0.050%), and 10th grade (95.1% compared to 95.0%, a difference of 0.090%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Australian and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 16.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.8% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 12.2%), and disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 1.5%), disability age over 75 (45.7% compared to 44.9%, a difference of 1.8%), and ambulatory disability (5.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 2.3%).