Australian vs Samoan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 140,117,510 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Samoans within Australian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.732. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Australians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.371% in Samoans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Australians corresponds to an increase of 370.6 Samoans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Australian and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,074 compared to $39,826, a difference of 30.7%), median male earnings ($62,857 compared to $51,389, a difference of 22.3%), and median earnings ($52,294 compared to $44,206, a difference of 18.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,739 compared to $54,610, a difference of 1.6%), householder income over 65 years ($66,891 compared to $65,427, a difference of 2.2%), and wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 8.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Australian and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 25.4%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.8% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 14.0%), and single father poverty (15.7% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.9% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 0.57%), single mother poverty (28.3% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 0.63%), and single female poverty (20.3% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Australian and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 12.8%), unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 12.2%), and female unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.060%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.2% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 0.17%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.43%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Australian and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.8% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 3.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 0.38%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 0.67%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.5% compared to 81.8%, a difference of 0.82%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Australian and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 20.6%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 17.3%), and births to unmarried women (29.5% compared to 32.6%, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 0.92%), currently married (47.6% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 1.7%), and married-couple households (47.4% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Australian and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 40.7%), no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 32.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 24.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 2.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 8.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 24.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Australian and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.9% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 77.0%), doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 68.6%), and master's degree (18.4% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 60.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.68%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.69%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.69%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Australian and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (22.0% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 15.5%), disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 14.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.8% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.25%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 3.4%), and cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 4.2%).