Australian vs Swiss Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 214,773,286 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Swiss within Australian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.358. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Australians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.213% in Swiss. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Australians corresponds to an increase of 213.3 Swiss.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Australian and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,074 compared to $44,076, a difference of 18.1%), median female earnings ($43,308 compared to $37,904, a difference of 14.3%), and median family income ($118,440 compared to $104,396, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,739 compared to $51,493, a difference of 4.4%), wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 30.0%, a difference of 6.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($66,891 compared to $61,621, a difference of 8.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Australian and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (15.7% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 9.8%), single male poverty (12.6% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 9.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.9% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among girls under 16 (14.8% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 0.040%), child poverty under the age of 16 (14.4% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 0.22%), and married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 0.61%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Australian and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 9.5%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.2% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 9.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.39%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 1.0%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.6% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Australian and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.8% compared to 43.3%, a difference of 14.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 0.15%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.15%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.19%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Australian and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in married-couple households (47.4% compared to 49.9%, a difference of 5.5%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 5.5%), and currently married (47.6% compared to 49.7%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.13 compared to 3.15, a difference of 0.58%), divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 0.94%), and single mother households (5.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Australian and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 28.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 18.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 2.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 61.0%, a difference of 7.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 14.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Australian and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.9% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 31.5%), master's degree (18.4% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 24.7%), and doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 21.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.11%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.12%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.12%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Australian and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 18.3%), hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 12.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.7% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 1.1%), cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 2.9%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 2.9%).