Australian vs Hawaiian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 174,548,986 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Hawaiians within Australian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.503. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Australians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.953% in Hawaiians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Australians corresponds to an increase of 952.6 Hawaiians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Australian and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,074 compared to $39,403, a difference of 32.2%), median male earnings ($62,857 compared to $50,488, a difference of 24.5%), and median family income ($118,440 compared to $98,869, a difference of 19.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,739 compared to $53,078, a difference of 1.3%), householder income over 65 years ($66,891 compared to $64,920, a difference of 3.0%), and wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 13.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Australian and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 34.2%), married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 19.3%), and family poverty (7.8% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 15.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.6% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 0.25%), single mother poverty (28.3% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 3.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.9% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Australian and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 19.7%), male unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 13.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.9%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.2% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 4.1%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Australian and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 2.5%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.90%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.5% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Australian and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 22.2%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 18.4%), and births to unmarried women (29.5% compared to 33.2%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.4% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 1.0%), divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 1.4%), and currently married (47.6% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Australian and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 36.3%), no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 25.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 24.3%, a difference of 20.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 92.0%, a difference of 2.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 60.4%, a difference of 6.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 24.3%, a difference of 20.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Australian and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.9% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 71.0%), doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 63.9%), and master's degree (18.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 58.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.55%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.55%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.56%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Australian and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (22.0% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 15.9%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.8% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 14.7%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.060%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 2.1%), and cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 2.5%).