Australian vs Taiwanese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 29,128,986 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Taiwanese within Australian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.898. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Australians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.120% in Taiwanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Australians corresponds to an increase of 119.9 Taiwanese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Australian and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($62,857 compared to $55,556, a difference of 13.1%), per capita income ($52,074 compared to $46,455, a difference of 12.1%), and wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($107,912 compared to $101,492, a difference of 6.3%), householder income over 65 years ($66,891 compared to $62,894, a difference of 6.4%), and median female earnings ($43,308 compared to $40,576, a difference of 6.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Australian and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (12.6% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 16.1%), receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 14.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.9% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 16 (14.4% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 0.50%), child poverty among boys under 16 (14.7% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 0.99%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (14.8% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Australian and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 33.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 32.0%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 19.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.43%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.6% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Australian and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.8% compared to 33.8%, a difference of 11.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.5% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.59%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.64%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 0.89%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Australian and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in currently married (47.6% compared to 45.8%, a difference of 4.0%), divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 3.6%), and single mother households (5.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.9% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 0.64%), family households (62.8% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 0.79%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Australian and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 15.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 7.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 0.38%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 88.4%, a difference of 1.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Australian and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 54.0%), professional degree (5.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 18.2%), and doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.91%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.91%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.92%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Australian and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 13.4%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 13.1%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 2.5%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.0% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 2.9%), and ambulatory disability (5.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 3.0%).