Australian vs Immigrants from Saudi Arabia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 116,141,134 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Saudi Arabia within Australian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.905. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Australians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.185% in Immigrants from Saudi Arabia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Australians corresponds to an increase of 185.2 Immigrants from Saudi Arabia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Australian and Immigrants from Saudi Arabia communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($53,739 compared to $46,187, a difference of 16.4%), per capita income ($52,074 compared to $46,008, a difference of 13.2%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($107,912 compared to $95,450, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 5.4%), householder income over 65 years ($66,891 compared to $63,355, a difference of 5.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($113,533 compared to $105,249, a difference of 7.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Australian and Immigrants from Saudi Arabia communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.8% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 21.7%), male poverty (10.4% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 21.7%), and poverty (11.4% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 20.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (28.3% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 3.1%), single female poverty (20.3% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 4.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.5% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 6.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Australian and Immigrants from Saudi Arabia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.5% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 9.4%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 6.4%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 0.25%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.51%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.92%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Australian and Immigrants from Saudi Arabia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 73.9%, a difference of 2.2%), in labor force | age 16-19 (37.8% compared to 37.0%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 66.3%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 0.070%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.22%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.32%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Australian and Immigrants from Saudi Arabia communities in the United States are seen in married-couple households (47.4% compared to 44.4%, a difference of 6.7%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 6.4%), and currently married (47.6% compared to 44.7%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.9% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 0.030%), average family size (3.13 compared to 3.17, a difference of 1.2%), and births to unmarried women (29.5% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Australian and Immigrants from Saudi Arabia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 16.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 11.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 54.2%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 89.9%, a difference of 0.18%), no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 1.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 54.2%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Australian and Immigrants from Saudi Arabia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 14.5%), doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 11.8%), and master's degree (18.4% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (70.4% compared to 70.4%, a difference of 0.070%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.28%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.28%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Australian and Immigrants from Saudi Arabia communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 15.6%), cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 11.1%), and disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 35 to 64 (10.8% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 0.040%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.64%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.0% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 0.88%).