Australian vs Mongolian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 104,604,746 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Mongolians within Australian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.467. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Australians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.118% in Mongolians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Australians corresponds to an increase of 118.5 Mongolians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Australian and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,074 compared to $49,173, a difference of 5.9%), wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 5.8%), and median male earnings ($62,857 compared to $60,350, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($113,533 compared to $111,602, a difference of 1.7%), median female earnings ($43,308 compared to $42,542, a difference of 1.8%), and householder income under 25 years ($53,739 compared to $52,540, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Australian and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 16.2%), family poverty (7.8% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 9.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.9% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.8% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 0.39%), single female poverty (20.3% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 0.96%), and single mother poverty (28.3% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Australian and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 11.4%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 5.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 0.36%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.75%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.9% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Australian and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.8% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 7.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 73.3%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.21%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.30%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 0.52%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Australian and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 7.4%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 6.0%), and births to unmarried women (29.5% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.8% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 0.10%), average family size (3.13 compared to 3.20, a difference of 2.1%), and married-couple households (47.4% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Australian and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 30.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 13.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 87.0%, a difference of 3.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 52.8%, a difference of 7.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 11.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Australian and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 30.9%), doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 15.1%), and master's degree (18.4% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (64.6% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 0.33%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.55%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.55%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Australian and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 20.4%), hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 15.6%), and male disability (11.3% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 0.75%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.0% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 1.2%), and disability age over 75 (45.7% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 1.5%).