Australian vs Immigrants from Singapore Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 105,104,605 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Singapore within Australian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.651. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Australians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.269% in Immigrants from Singapore. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Australians corresponds to an increase of 269.4 Immigrants from Singapore.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Australian and Immigrants from Singapore communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($107,912 compared to $124,429, a difference of 15.3%), median household income ($96,490 compared to $110,428, a difference of 14.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($113,533 compared to $129,514, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 2.6%), householder income under 25 years ($53,739 compared to $56,835, a difference of 5.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($66,891 compared to $72,963, a difference of 9.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Australian and Immigrants from Singapore communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (15.5% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 19.8%), child poverty among girls under 16 (14.8% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 18.7%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (14.7% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.8% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 0.43%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.9% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Australian and Immigrants from Singapore communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 14.4%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.5% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 11.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.23%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.41%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Australian and Immigrants from Singapore communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.8% compared to 33.5%, a difference of 12.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.34%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 0.41%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Australian and Immigrants from Singapore communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 16.5%), births to unmarried women (29.5% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 15.2%), and divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.6% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 0.37%), family households (62.8% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 0.38%), and average family size (3.13 compared to 3.16, a difference of 0.76%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Australian and Immigrants from Singapore communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 28.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 10.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 87.2%, a difference of 3.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 5.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 9.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Australian and Immigrants from Singapore communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 53.6%), professional degree (5.9% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 31.5%), and master's degree (18.4% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 27.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (94.1% compared to 94.2%, a difference of 0.12%), 10th grade (95.1% compared to 95.0%, a difference of 0.14%), and nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.22%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Australian and Immigrants from Singapore communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 28.6%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.8% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 20.6%), and hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.7% compared to 45.6%, a difference of 0.090%), cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 2.0%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.0% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 7.8%).