Egyptian vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 149,275,400 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Czechoslovakia within Egyptian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.271. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Egyptians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.022% in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Egyptians corresponds to an increase of 21.7 Immigrants from Czechoslovakia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Egyptian and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($48,358 compared to $51,770, a difference of 7.1%), wage/income gap (26.6% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 2.6%), and median male earnings ($61,095 compared to $62,217, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,444 compared to $54,352, a difference of 0.17%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($112,256 compared to $111,914, a difference of 0.30%), and median household income ($95,673 compared to $95,319, a difference of 0.37%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Egyptian and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (14.7% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 10.5%), family poverty (8.1% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 6.1%), and married-couple family poverty (4.8% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (19.1% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 0.12%), child poverty under the age of 5 (14.9% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 1.2%), and single mother poverty (26.9% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Egyptian and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 4.6%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.1% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 3.8%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.42%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.54%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.4% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 0.69%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Egyptian and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.5% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 5.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (73.7% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.5% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.070%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.30%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Egyptian and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 11.2%), family households with children (28.6% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 9.0%), and divorced or separated (11.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (28.2% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 0.54%), married-couple households (48.2% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 0.85%), and currently married (47.9% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Egyptian and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 5.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.0% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 2.7%), and no vehicles in household (11.9% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 0.94%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.2% compared to 88.3%, a difference of 0.18%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.3% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 0.27%), and no vehicles in household (11.9% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 0.94%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Egyptian and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 13.4%), professional degree (5.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 10.7%), and doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.28%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.28%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.28%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Egyptian and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 14.4%), male disability (10.1% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 8.0%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 1.7%), disability age over 75 (46.1% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 2.2%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.6% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 2.7%).