Immigrants from Eastern Asia vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Eastern Asia
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Eastern Asia
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
7,941
SOCIAL INDEX
76.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
99th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,836
SOCIAL INDEX
85.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
45th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Integration in Immigrants from Eastern Asia Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 192,992,630 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Czechoslovakia within Immigrant from Eastern Asia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.177. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Eastern Asia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Eastern Asia corresponds to a decrease of 0.7 Immigrants from Czechoslovakia.
Immigrants from Eastern Asia vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($118,056 compared to $106,888, a difference of 10.4%), median household income ($104,796 compared to $95,319, a difference of 9.9%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($122,222 compared to $111,914, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 0.77%), per capita income ($53,806 compared to $51,770, a difference of 3.9%), and householder income under 25 years ($57,123 compared to $54,352, a difference of 5.1%).
| Income Metric | Immigrants from Eastern Asia | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia |
| Per Capita Income | Exceptional $53,806 | Exceptional $51,770 |
| Median Family Income | Exceptional $125,150 | Exceptional $116,165 |
| Median Household Income | Exceptional $104,796 | Exceptional $95,319 |
| Median Earnings | Exceptional $56,183 | Exceptional $52,361 |
| Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $66,903 | Exceptional $62,217 |
| Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $46,502 | Exceptional $43,571 |
| Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $57,123 | Exceptional $54,352 |
| Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $118,056 | Exceptional $106,888 |
| Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $122,222 | Exceptional $111,914 |
| Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $69,872 | Exceptional $66,376 |
| Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.1% | Tragic 27.3% |
Immigrants from Eastern Asia vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.1% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 10.4%), child poverty under the age of 5 (13.5% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 9.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (7.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 0.65%), female poverty (12.2% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 2.6%), and poverty (11.3% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 3.1%).
| Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Eastern Asia | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia |
| Poverty | Exceptional 11.3% | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Families | Exceptional 7.7% | Exceptional 7.7% |
| Males | Exceptional 10.4% | Exceptional 10.0% |
| Females | Exceptional 12.2% | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Females 18 to 24 years | Good 19.8% | Exceptional 19.1% |
| Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.2% | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 13.5% | Exceptional 14.8% |
| Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.1% | Exceptional 13.9% |
| Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.3% | Exceptional 14.4% |
| Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.4% | Exceptional 14.2% |
| Single Males | Exceptional 11.4% | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Single Females | Exceptional 18.1% | Exceptional 19.0% |
| Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.0% | Good 16.2% |
| Single Mothers | Exceptional 26.1% | Exceptional 27.4% |
| Married Couples | Exceptional 4.8% | Exceptional 4.6% |
| Seniors Over 65 years | Fair 11.1% | Exceptional 10.0% |
| Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 12.8% | Excellent 11.7% |
| Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.3% | Exceptional 9.6% |
Immigrants from Eastern Asia vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.7% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 16.9%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.3% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 11.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.9% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.090%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.12%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.14%).
| Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Eastern Asia | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia |
| Unemployment | Excellent 5.1% | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Males | Exceptional 5.1% | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Females | Excellent 5.1% | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Youth < 25 | Good 11.5% | Good 11.5% |
| Age | 16 to 19 years | Good 17.4% | Fair 17.8% |
| Age | 20 to 24 years | Average 10.3% | Average 10.3% |
| Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.2% | Good 6.6% |
| Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Excellent 5.3% |
| Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Excellent 4.5% |
| Age | 45 to 54 years | Excellent 4.4% | Excellent 4.4% |
| Age | 55 to 59 years | Fair 4.8% | Fair 4.8% |
| Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.0% | Fair 4.9% |
| Age | 65 to 74 years | Good 5.3% | Good 5.3% |
| Seniors > 65 | Average 5.1% | Good 5.1% |
| Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.9% | Exceptional 8.4% |
| Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.3% | Exceptional 7.0% |
| Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 7.7% | Fair 9.0% |
| Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.9% | Excellent 5.2% |
Immigrants from Eastern Asia vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (32.0% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 14.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.8% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.010%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.050%).
| Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Eastern Asia | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia |
| In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 65.7% | Poor 64.8% |
| In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Excellent 79.9% | Excellent 79.9% |
| In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 32.0% | Average 36.6% |
| In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 71.8% | Average 75.0% |
| In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Good 84.8% | Exceptional 85.4% |
| In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.4% | Exceptional 85.4% |
| In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 84.7% | Exceptional 84.8% |
| In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.4% | Exceptional 83.4% |
Immigrants from Eastern Asia vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (10.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 14.2%), births to unmarried women (25.0% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 13.4%), and single father households (1.9% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.2% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 0.33%), married-couple households (48.8% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 2.1%), and family households (64.9% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 2.3%).
| Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Eastern Asia | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia |
| Family Households | Exceptional 64.9% | Tragic 63.4% |
| Family Households with Children | Excellent 27.7% | Tragic 26.2% |
| Married-couple Households | Exceptional 48.8% | Exceptional 47.8% |
| Average Family Size | Average 3.22 | Tragic 3.14 |
| Single Father Households | Exceptional 1.9% | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.1% | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Currently Married | Exceptional 48.2% | Exceptional 48.4% |
| Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 10.2% | Exceptional 11.7% |
| Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 25.0% | Exceptional 28.4% |
Immigrants from Eastern Asia vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.5% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 15.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 7.5%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (86.5% compared to 88.3%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (53.2% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 1.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 1.9%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (86.5% compared to 88.3%, a difference of 2.1%).
| Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Eastern Asia | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia |
| No Vehicles Available | Tragic 13.5% | Tragic 11.8% |
| 1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 86.5% | Tragic 88.3% |
| 2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 53.2% | Tragic 54.1% |
| 3+ Vehicles Available | Poor 18.8% | Tragic 18.5% |
| 4+ Vehicles Available | Fair 6.2% | Tragic 5.8% |
Immigrants from Eastern Asia vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 29.7%), doctorate degree (3.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 25.4%), and professional degree (6.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.7% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.57%), kindergarten (97.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.57%), and ged/equivalency (87.4% compared to 87.9%, a difference of 0.57%).
| Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Eastern Asia | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia |
| No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.4% | Exceptional 1.8% |
| Nursery School | Tragic 97.7% | Exceptional 98.2% |
| Kindergarten | Tragic 97.6% | Exceptional 98.2% |
| 1st Grade | Tragic 97.6% | Exceptional 98.2% |
| 2nd Grade | Tragic 97.6% | Exceptional 98.1% |
| 3rd Grade | Tragic 97.4% | Exceptional 98.0% |
| 4th Grade | Tragic 97.2% | Exceptional 97.9% |
| 5th Grade | Tragic 97.0% | Exceptional 97.7% |
| 6th Grade | Tragic 96.7% | Exceptional 97.4% |
| 7th Grade | Tragic 95.6% | Exceptional 96.6% |
| 8th Grade | Tragic 95.4% | Exceptional 96.4% |
| 9th Grade | Poor 94.6% | Exceptional 95.7% |
| 10th Grade | Fair 93.6% | Exceptional 94.7% |
| 11th Grade | Good 92.7% | Exceptional 93.8% |
| 12th Grade, No Diploma | Excellent 91.8% | Exceptional 92.7% |
| High School Diploma | Excellent 89.9% | Exceptional 90.9% |
| GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 87.4% | Exceptional 87.9% |
| College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 71.3% | Exceptional 69.6% |
| College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 66.6% | Exceptional 64.1% |
| Associate's Degree | Exceptional 55.4% | Exceptional 51.9% |
| Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 48.1% | Exceptional 44.0% |
| Master's Degree | Exceptional 20.8% | Exceptional 18.5% |
| Professional Degree | Exceptional 6.6% | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 3.0% | Exceptional 2.4% |
Immigrants from Eastern Asia vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 17.1%), hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 16.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (8.8% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 2.2%), disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 2.3%), and disability age 65 to 74 (20.3% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 3.5%).
| Disability Metric | Immigrants from Eastern Asia | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia |
| Disability | Exceptional 10.2% | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Males | Exceptional 9.6% | Excellent 10.9% |
| Females | Exceptional 10.7% | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.0% | Excellent 1.2% |
| Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Exceptional 5.2% |
| Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.6% | Exceptional 6.3% |
| Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 8.8% | Exceptional 10.0% |
| Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 20.3% | Exceptional 21.0% |
| Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.2% | Exceptional 45.1% |
| Vision | Exceptional 1.8% | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Hearing | Exceptional 2.7% | Poor 3.1% |
| Cognitive | Exceptional 16.8% | Exceptional 16.2% |
| Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.3% | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Exceptional 2.4% |