Russian vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 193,719,312 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Czechoslovakia within Russian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.680. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Russians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.051% in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Russians corresponds to an increase of 50.7 Immigrants from Czechoslovakia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Russian and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,328 compared to $111,914, a difference of 3.9%), median family income ($120,487 compared to $116,165, a difference of 3.7%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($110,398 compared to $106,888, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,389 compared to $54,352, a difference of 0.070%), median female earnings ($44,169 compared to $43,571, a difference of 1.4%), and median earnings ($53,334 compared to $52,361, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Russian and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 6.1%), child poverty among boys under 16 (13.8% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 4.4%), and single male poverty (12.5% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 0.020%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.11%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (14.8% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 0.11%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Russian and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.9% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 5.3%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 3.0%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.8% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.18%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.24%), and male unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.26%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Russian and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.7% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 0.38%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.23%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.8% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 0.19%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.3% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.090%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.9% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 0.14%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Russian and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (11.5% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 1.5%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 1.4%), and births to unmarried women (28.0% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.4% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 0.070%), currently married (48.6% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 0.42%), and average family size (3.12 compared to 3.14, a difference of 0.58%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Russian and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 3.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 1.9%), and no vehicles in household (11.6% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 88.3%, a difference of 0.38%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.8% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 1.3%), and no vehicles in household (11.6% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Russian and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 9.2%), professional degree (6.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 8.8%), and doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.16%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.17%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.17%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Russian and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 14.4%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.5% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 4.0%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 0.17%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.2% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 0.75%), and disability age over 75 (45.5% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 0.90%).