Dutch West Indian vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 54,017,757 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Czechoslovakia within Dutch West Indian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.902. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Dutch West Indians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.094% in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Dutch West Indians corresponds to an increase of 94.4 Immigrants from Czechoslovakia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Dutch West Indian and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($35,922 compared to $51,770, a difference of 44.1%), median family income ($81,852 compared to $116,165, a difference of 41.9%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($79,171 compared to $111,914, a difference of 41.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 3.6%), householder income under 25 years ($45,816 compared to $54,352, a difference of 18.6%), and median female earnings ($34,106 compared to $43,571, a difference of 27.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Dutch West Indian and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (23.3% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 57.7%), child poverty under the age of 16 (21.5% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 54.4%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (21.6% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 52.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.5% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 14.8%), single father poverty (19.2% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 18.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.4% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 24.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Dutch West Indian and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.5% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 34.6%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 25.1%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (8.2% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 24.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.3%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 3.0%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.9% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Dutch West Indian and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (78.2% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 6.6%), in labor force | age 20-64 (75.5% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 5.9%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.4% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.7% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 1.8%), in labor force | age 16-19 (35.6% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 2.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (61.7% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Dutch West Indian and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 36.4%), births to unmarried women (38.4% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 35.3%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 29.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.3% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 1.4%), average family size (3.23 compared to 3.14, a difference of 2.9%), and family households with children (27.2% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Dutch West Indian and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 23.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 13.1%), and no vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.0% compared to 88.3%, a difference of 0.82%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.6% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 2.7%), and no vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Dutch West Indian and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 87.9%), doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 77.4%), and master's degree (10.6% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 74.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.19%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.19%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.20%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Dutch West Indian and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 61.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (15.6% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 56.7%), and vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 56.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 11.9%), disability age over 75 (51.5% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 14.2%), and self-care disability (3.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 26.6%).