Fijian vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 40,008,669 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Czechoslovakia within Fijian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.969. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Fijians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.020% in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Fijians corresponds to an increase of 20.4 Immigrants from Czechoslovakia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,690 compared to $51,770, a difference of 41.1%), median male earnings ($45,607 compared to $62,217, a difference of 36.4%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($79,956 compared to $106,888, a difference of 33.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,132 compared to $54,352, a difference of 8.4%), householder income over 65 years ($56,768 compared to $66,376, a difference of 16.9%), and wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 19.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.0% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 35.0%), child poverty under the age of 5 (19.9% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 34.8%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (18.4% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 32.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.54%), single father poverty (15.7% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 3.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.0% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (6.6% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 36.2%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.3% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 31.5%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (3.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 26.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.2%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 1.6%), and male unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 10.6%), in labor force | age 45-54 (80.2% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 0.050%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.4% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 47.7%), single mother households (7.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 35.2%), and births to unmarried women (32.3% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (46.1% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 3.7%), family households (65.9% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 3.9%), and currently married (46.3% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 35.3%), no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 23.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 20.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 88.3%, a difference of 2.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.6% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 6.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 20.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 109.4%), professional degree (2.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 98.9%), and master's degree (10.3% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 80.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.68%), kindergarten (97.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.68%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.68%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (13.2% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 32.6%), disability age 65 to 74 (27.0% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 28.6%), and vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 0.32%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 8.7%), and disability age over 75 (49.0% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 8.7%).