Sri Lankan vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 183,723,211 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Czechoslovakia within Sri Lankan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.141. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Sri Lankans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.000% in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Sri Lankans corresponds to a decrease of 0.4 Immigrants from Czechoslovakia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Sri Lankan and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($44,014 compared to $51,770, a difference of 17.6%), median male earnings ($56,136 compared to $62,217, a difference of 10.8%), and median earnings ($48,040 compared to $52,361, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($55,470 compared to $54,352, a difference of 2.1%), median household income ($93,093 compared to $95,319, a difference of 2.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($108,270 compared to $111,914, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Sri Lankan and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (14.2% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 14.5%), married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 10.7%), and family poverty (8.5% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (19.2% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 0.71%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.82%), and single mother poverty (26.7% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Sri Lankan and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.5% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 7.8%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 5.9%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.5% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.28%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.42%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.67%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Sri Lankan and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.5% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 2.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.3% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.76%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.0% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 0.11%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.9% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 0.14%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.19%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Sri Lankan and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 16.7%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 15.7%), and family households with children (29.5% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (28.9% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 1.9%), currently married (47.3% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 2.2%), and married-couple households (49.0% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Sri Lankan and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 55.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 45.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.6% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 27.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.5% compared to 88.3%, a difference of 4.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.0% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 12.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.6% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 27.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Sri Lankan and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.0% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 67.4%), professional degree (4.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 36.5%), and doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 26.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.3%), kindergarten (97.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.3%), and 1st grade (96.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Sri Lankan and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (23.0% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 9.5%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 8.1%), and disability age over 75 (48.5% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.43%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 0.79%), and female disability (11.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.5%).