Jordanian vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 108,243,556 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Czechoslovakia within Jordanian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.450. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Jordanians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.069% in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Jordanians corresponds to an increase of 68.6 Immigrants from Czechoslovakia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,605 compared to $51,770, a difference of 13.5%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($99,186 compared to $106,888, a difference of 7.8%), and median male earnings ($58,500 compared to $62,217, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.8% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 1.8%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($109,376 compared to $111,914, a difference of 2.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($64,313 compared to $66,376, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 16 (14.8% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 6.7%), family poverty (8.2% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 6.3%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (15.6% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.32%), single father poverty (16.1% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 0.59%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.1% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 0.67%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.0% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 10.7%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 9.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.52%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 0.81%), and female unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (66.3% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 2.3%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 0.72%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.040%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 0.27%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.44%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 11.8%), family households with children (29.0% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 10.5%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (28.5% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 0.46%), currently married (48.0% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 0.73%), and married-couple households (48.4% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.5% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 38.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 13.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 88.3%, a difference of 3.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.6% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 6.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 8.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 22.8%), doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 17.9%), and master's degree (16.5% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.18%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.18%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.18%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 9.4%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 6.4%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.2% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.050%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 0.88%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 1.7%).