Alaska Native vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 56,852,000 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Czechoslovakia within Alaska Native communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.400. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Alaska Natives within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.030% in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Alaska Natives corresponds to an increase of 30.1 Immigrants from Czechoslovakia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,558 compared to $51,770, a difference of 30.9%), median male earnings ($49,711 compared to $62,217, a difference of 25.2%), and median family income ($95,573 compared to $116,165, a difference of 21.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,000 compared to $54,352, a difference of 0.65%), householder income over 65 years ($60,748 compared to $66,376, a difference of 9.3%), and wage/income gap (24.4% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 11.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (15.6% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 61.9%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (16.8% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 38.4%), and married-couple family poverty (6.2% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 35.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 2.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.8% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 8.2%), and single father poverty (18.1% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 11.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (14.7% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 73.8%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (8.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 61.5%), and male unemployment (8.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 58.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.3% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 14.2%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (21.8% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 22.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 23.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 6.9%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.3% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 5.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.6% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 0.070%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.8% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 72.2%), single mother households (7.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 39.0%), and births to unmarried women (38.3% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 34.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.1% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 2.6%), married-couple households (45.6% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 4.8%), and currently married (45.5% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 6.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 47.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 27.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (53.6% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 0.97%), 1 or more vehicles in household (83.8% compared to 88.3%, a difference of 5.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 13.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 68.1%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 64.1%), and master's degree (11.6% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 59.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (94.9% compared to 94.7%, a difference of 0.15%), 11th grade (93.5% compared to 93.8%, a difference of 0.35%), and 9th grade (96.1% compared to 95.7%, a difference of 0.43%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (2.9% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 146.0%), disability age 65 to 74 (30.6% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 45.8%), and disability age 35 to 64 (14.5% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 45.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 2.6%), ambulatory disability (6.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 6.2%), and cognitive disability (17.5% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 8.2%).