Immigrants from Lithuania vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Lithuania
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Lithuania
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
9,656
SOCIAL INDEX
94.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
10th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,836
SOCIAL INDEX
85.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
45th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Integration in Immigrants from Lithuania Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 87,751,286 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Czechoslovakia within Immigrant from Lithuania communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.191. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Lithuania within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.065% in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Lithuania corresponds to an increase of 64.7 Immigrants from Czechoslovakia.
Immigrants from Lithuania vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.6% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 4.9%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($114,336 compared to $111,914, a difference of 2.2%), and median male earnings ($63,346 compared to $62,217, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($66,087 compared to $66,376, a difference of 0.44%), median female earnings ($43,317 compared to $43,571, a difference of 0.59%), and median earnings ($52,769 compared to $52,361, a difference of 0.78%).
| Income Metric | Immigrants from Lithuania | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia |
| Per Capita Income | Exceptional $51,361 | Exceptional $51,770 |
| Median Family Income | Exceptional $118,053 | Exceptional $116,165 |
| Median Household Income | Exceptional $96,836 | Exceptional $95,319 |
| Median Earnings | Exceptional $52,769 | Exceptional $52,361 |
| Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $63,346 | Exceptional $62,217 |
| Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $43,317 | Exceptional $43,571 |
| Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $55,028 | Exceptional $54,352 |
| Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $108,149 | Exceptional $106,888 |
| Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $114,336 | Exceptional $111,914 |
| Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $66,087 | Exceptional $66,376 |
| Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 28.6% | Tragic 27.3% |
Immigrants from Lithuania vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.4% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 9.7%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 9.1%), and single mother poverty (25.2% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.7% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 3.5%), single male poverty (11.6% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 4.1%), and receiving food stamps (9.2% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 4.3%).
| Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Lithuania | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia |
| Poverty | Exceptional 10.3% | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Families | Exceptional 7.2% | Exceptional 7.7% |
| Males | Exceptional 9.4% | Exceptional 10.0% |
| Females | Exceptional 11.3% | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 17.4% | Exceptional 19.1% |
| Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.1% | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 14.1% | Exceptional 14.8% |
| Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 12.9% | Exceptional 13.9% |
| Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.5% | Exceptional 14.4% |
| Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.1% | Exceptional 14.2% |
| Single Males | Exceptional 11.6% | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Single Females | Exceptional 17.8% | Exceptional 19.0% |
| Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.3% | Good 16.2% |
| Single Mothers | Exceptional 25.2% | Exceptional 27.4% |
| Married Couples | Exceptional 4.3% | Exceptional 4.6% |
| Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.7% | Exceptional 10.0% |
| Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.0% | Excellent 11.7% |
| Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.2% | Exceptional 9.6% |
Immigrants from Lithuania vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 7.2%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 7.0%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.55%), male unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.73%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.4%).
| Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Lithuania | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia |
| Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Males | Excellent 5.1% | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Females | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.3% | Good 11.5% |
| Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 17.0% | Fair 17.8% |
| Age | 20 to 24 years | Excellent 10.1% | Average 10.3% |
| Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.2% | Good 6.6% |
| Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Excellent 5.3% |
| Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Excellent 4.5% |
| Age | 45 to 54 years | Fair 4.6% | Excellent 4.4% |
| Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Fair 4.8% |
| Age | 60 to 64 years | Excellent 4.8% | Fair 4.9% |
| Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Good 5.3% |
| Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 5.0% | Good 5.1% |
| Seniors > 75 | Average 8.7% | Exceptional 8.4% |
| Women w/ Children < 6 | Good 7.5% | Exceptional 7.0% |
| Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Fair 9.0% |
| Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 5.2% | Excellent 5.2% |
Immigrants from Lithuania vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.2% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 1.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.33%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.9% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.56%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.4% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.66%).
| Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Lithuania | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia |
| In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 65.6% | Poor 64.8% |
| In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.7% | Excellent 79.9% |
| In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Excellent 37.2% | Average 36.6% |
| In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 76.1% | Average 75.0% |
| In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 86.1% | Exceptional 85.4% |
| In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.6% | Exceptional 85.4% |
| In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.4% | Exceptional 84.8% |
| In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.9% | Exceptional 83.4% |
Immigrants from Lithuania vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.9% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 7.8%), divorced or separated (11.3% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 3.6%), and births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.15 compared to 3.14, a difference of 0.37%), family households (63.9% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 0.70%), and currently married (48.8% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 1.0%).
| Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Lithuania | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia |
| Family Households | Poor 63.9% | Tragic 63.4% |
| Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.8% | Tragic 26.2% |
| Married-couple Households | Exceptional 48.6% | Exceptional 47.8% |
| Average Family Size | Tragic 3.15 | Tragic 3.14 |
| Single Father Households | Exceptional 1.9% | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.3% | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Currently Married | Exceptional 48.8% | Exceptional 48.4% |
| Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.3% | Exceptional 11.7% |
| Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 27.7% | Exceptional 28.4% |
Immigrants from Lithuania vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 20.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.8% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 3.2%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 0.11%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 88.3%, a difference of 2.2%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 2.5%).
| Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Lithuania | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia |
| No Vehicles Available | Excellent 9.8% | Tragic 11.8% |
| 1+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 90.2% | Tragic 88.3% |
| 2+ Vehicles Available | Good 55.8% | Tragic 54.1% |
| 3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 18.5% | Tragic 18.5% |
| 4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 5.6% | Tragic 5.8% |
Immigrants from Lithuania vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 7.8%), doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 7.0%), and professional degree (5.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.11%), 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.11%), and 2nd grade (98.2% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.11%).
| Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Lithuania | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia |
| No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Exceptional 1.8% |
| Nursery School | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.2% |
| Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.2% |
| 1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.2% |
| 2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.1% |
| 3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.0% |
| 4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 97.9% |
| 5th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Exceptional 97.7% |
| 6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Exceptional 97.4% |
| 7th Grade | Exceptional 96.8% | Exceptional 96.6% |
| 8th Grade | Exceptional 96.6% | Exceptional 96.4% |
| 9th Grade | Exceptional 95.8% | Exceptional 95.7% |
| 10th Grade | Exceptional 95.0% | Exceptional 94.7% |
| 11th Grade | Exceptional 94.1% | Exceptional 93.8% |
| 12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 93.1% | Exceptional 92.7% |
| High School Diploma | Exceptional 91.3% | Exceptional 90.9% |
| GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 88.6% | Exceptional 87.9% |
| College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 70.3% | Exceptional 69.6% |
| College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 64.6% | Exceptional 64.1% |
| Associate's Degree | Exceptional 52.4% | Exceptional 51.9% |
| Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 44.6% | Exceptional 44.0% |
| Master's Degree | Exceptional 18.5% | Exceptional 18.5% |
| Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.6% | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.2% | Exceptional 2.4% |
Immigrants from Lithuania vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 8.7%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 6.4%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (44.9% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 0.55%), cognitive disability (16.0% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 1.6%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.8%).
| Disability Metric | Immigrants from Lithuania | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia |
| Disability | Exceptional 10.9% | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Males | Exceptional 10.5% | Excellent 10.9% |
| Females | Exceptional 11.2% | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Age | Under 5 years | Fair 1.3% | Excellent 1.2% |
| Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Exceptional 5.2% |
| Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.8% | Exceptional 6.3% |
| Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 9.6% | Exceptional 10.0% |
| Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 20.5% | Exceptional 21.0% |
| Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 44.9% | Exceptional 45.1% |
| Vision | Exceptional 1.9% | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Hearing | Good 2.9% | Poor 3.1% |
| Cognitive | Exceptional 16.0% | Exceptional 16.2% |
| Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.6% | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Exceptional 2.4% |