Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chickasaw
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,836
SOCIAL INDEX
85.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
45th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Integration in Chickasaw Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 87,580,844 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Czechoslovakia within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.866. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.171% in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 171.4 Immigrants from Czechoslovakia.
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,475 compared to $51,770, a difference of 41.9%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $106,888, a difference of 37.2%), and median household income ($70,005 compared to $95,319, a difference of 36.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 0.40%), householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $54,352, a difference of 21.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $66,376, a difference of 23.5%).
Income Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,475 | Exceptional $51,770 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $85,356 | Exceptional $116,165 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,005 | Exceptional $95,319 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,672 | Exceptional $52,361 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,832 | Exceptional $62,217 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,414 | Exceptional $43,571 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,763 | Exceptional $54,352 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $77,929 | Exceptional $106,888 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $82,193 | Exceptional $111,914 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,732 | Exceptional $66,376 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.2% | Tragic 27.3% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 47.7%), family poverty (10.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 41.4%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.0% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 40.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.69%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 6.7%), and single father poverty (19.0% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 17.0%).
Poverty Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia |
Poverty | Tragic 14.7% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Families | Tragic 10.8% | Exceptional 7.7% |
Males | Tragic 13.5% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Females | Tragic 15.9% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.5% | Exceptional 19.1% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.0% | Exceptional 12.1% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.8% | Exceptional 14.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.5% | Exceptional 13.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.8% | Exceptional 14.4% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Exceptional 14.2% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.3% | Exceptional 12.1% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.3% | Exceptional 19.0% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.0% | Good 16.2% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.4% | Exceptional 27.4% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.7% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.6% | Excellent 11.7% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.1% | Exceptional 9.6% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 27.4%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 18.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.34%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.1%), and male unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.3%).
Unemployment Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Excellent 5.2% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Good 11.5% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Fair 17.8% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Average 10.3% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Fair 6.7% | Good 6.6% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.2% | Excellent 5.3% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 4.9% | Excellent 4.5% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Excellent 4.4% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Fair 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Fair 4.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Good 5.3% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.4% | Good 5.1% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.3% | Exceptional 8.4% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.0% | Exceptional 7.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Fair 9.0% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Excellent 5.2% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 5.5%), in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 4.9%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 0.71%), in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 4.2%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.3% | Poor 64.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 76.2% | Excellent 79.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.3% | Average 36.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Average 75.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.9% | Exceptional 85.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Exceptional 85.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.9% | Exceptional 84.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.0% | Exceptional 83.4% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 35.3%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 32.3%), and births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 27.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.19 compared to 3.14, a difference of 1.5%), family households (64.4% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 1.5%), and currently married (46.6% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 3.8%).
Family Structure Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia |
Family Households | Good 64.4% | Tragic 63.4% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.2% | Tragic 26.2% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 45.9% | Exceptional 47.8% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.19 | Tragic 3.14 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.8% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Currently Married | Average 46.6% | Exceptional 48.4% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.2% | Exceptional 11.7% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.3% | Exceptional 28.4% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 50.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 28.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 20.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 88.3%, a difference of 4.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 9.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 20.1%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Tragic 11.8% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Tragic 88.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.0% | Tragic 54.1% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.2% | Tragic 18.5% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Tragic 5.8% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 73.2%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 62.4%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 56.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (96.4% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 0.040%), 7th grade (96.7% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 0.11%), and 4th grade (98.0% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.14%).
Education Level Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Exceptional 1.8% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.2% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.2% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.2% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.1% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.0% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 97.9% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 97.7% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Exceptional 97.4% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Exceptional 96.6% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Exceptional 96.4% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Exceptional 95.7% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Exceptional 94.7% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Exceptional 93.8% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.3% | Exceptional 92.7% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.4% | Exceptional 90.9% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.8% | Exceptional 87.9% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.4% | Exceptional 69.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.3% | Exceptional 64.1% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.6% | Exceptional 51.9% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.4% | Exceptional 44.0% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Exceptional 18.5% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.4% | Exceptional 5.8% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Exceptional 2.4% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 61.5%), vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 57.6%), and disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 45.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 13.5%), cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 14.1%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 21.3%).
Disability Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia |
Disability | Tragic 15.2% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Males | Tragic 15.1% | Excellent 10.9% |
Females | Tragic 15.2% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Excellent 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.8% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Exceptional 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.2% | Exceptional 21.0% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.2% | Exceptional 45.1% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.5% | Poor 3.1% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.5% | Exceptional 16.2% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.0% | Exceptional 5.8% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Exceptional 2.4% |