Argentinean vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 156,872,919 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Czechoslovakia within Argentinean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.094. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Argentineans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.004% in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Argentineans corresponds to an increase of 4.4 Immigrants from Czechoslovakia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in median earnings ($50,399 compared to $52,361, a difference of 3.9%), median female earnings ($41,952 compared to $43,571, a difference of 3.9%), and per capita income ($49,862 compared to $51,770, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,154 compared to $54,352, a difference of 0.36%), wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 1.1%), and median household income ($93,960 compared to $95,319, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.7% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 16.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.4% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 14.5%), and receiving food stamps (10.8% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (19.1% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 0.34%), single mother poverty (27.2% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.54%), and single male poverty (11.9% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.9% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 6.3%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 5.6%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.29%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.30%), and unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.74%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.3% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 9.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.1% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.0% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 0.11%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.12%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.18%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 9.8%), births to unmarried women (30.0% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 5.6%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.5% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 0.50%), divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 1.5%), and family households (65.0% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 6.7%), no vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 5.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.9% compared to 88.3%, a difference of 0.63%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.5% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 0.73%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 13.9%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 3.5%), and master's degree (18.2% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.27%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.27%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.27%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 13.7%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 9.1%), and male disability (10.1% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 0.52%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 0.65%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.2% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 0.93%).