Ottawa vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 33,053,053 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Czechoslovakia within Ottawa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.938. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ottawa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.408% in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ottawa corresponds to an increase of 407.9 Immigrants from Czechoslovakia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ottawa and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,101 compared to $51,770, a difference of 39.5%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($79,012 compared to $106,888, a difference of 35.3%), and median family income ($86,380 compared to $116,165, a difference of 34.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 1.1%), householder income under 25 years ($47,366 compared to $54,352, a difference of 14.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,217 compared to $66,376, a difference of 24.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ottawa and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 41.2%), child poverty under the age of 16 (19.2% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 38.1%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (20.3% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 37.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 3.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.4% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 4.2%), and married-couple family poverty (5.2% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 13.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ottawa and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.9% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 40.3%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 23.4%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 20.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.74%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 2.5%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.1% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ottawa and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.0% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 17.6%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.5% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 5.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (62.0% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.8% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 2.4%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.6% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.0% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ottawa and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.7% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 30.9%), births to unmarried women (36.5% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 28.4%), and single mother households (6.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 22.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.1% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 0.58%), family households (63.0% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 0.66%), and average family size (3.11 compared to 3.14, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ottawa and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 59.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 14.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.7% compared to 88.3%, a difference of 5.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.9% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 7.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 9.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ottawa and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 69.7%), master's degree (11.9% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 56.4%), and doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 49.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (93.6% compared to 93.8%, a difference of 0.18%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.23%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.24%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ottawa and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (14.6% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 46.7%), disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 43.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.6% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 36.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.6% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 5.5%), cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 12.1%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 14.0%).