Nonimmigrants vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 195,350,991 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Czechoslovakia within Nonimmigrant communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.318. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Nonimmigrants within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.000% in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Nonimmigrants corresponds to an increase of 0.5 Immigrants from Czechoslovakia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Nonimmigrants and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($40,669 compared to $51,770, a difference of 27.3%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($88,301 compared to $106,888, a difference of 21.0%), and median family income ($96,231 compared to $116,165, a difference of 20.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 0.31%), householder income under 25 years ($49,348 compared to $54,352, a difference of 10.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($57,426 compared to $66,376, a difference of 15.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Nonimmigrants and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (19.7% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 33.7%), child poverty among girls under 16 (18.3% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 29.4%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (15.6% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 29.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 4.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.9% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 8.7%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.5% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 12.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Nonimmigrants and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 25.8%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.8% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 16.6%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.9% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 0.55%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.73%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.84%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Nonimmigrants and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.1% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 9.6%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.2% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.1% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.2% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 1.6%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.2% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.5% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Nonimmigrants and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 25.5%), births to unmarried women (35.5% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 25.2%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 20.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.19 compared to 3.14, a difference of 1.4%), married-couple households (46.9% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 1.9%), and family households (64.8% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Nonimmigrants and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 49.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 25.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 17.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.2% compared to 88.3%, a difference of 4.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.8% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 8.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 17.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Nonimmigrants and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 49.3%), doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 40.5%), and master's degree (13.3% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 39.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4th grade (97.9% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.0%), 6th grade (97.4% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.0%), and 5th grade (97.7% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.010%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Nonimmigrants and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 34.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (13.0% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 30.8%), and vision disability (2.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 22.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.0% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 6.5%), cognitive disability (17.4% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 7.3%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 12.1%).