Immigrants from Uruguay vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Uruguay
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Uruguay
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
3,806
SOCIAL INDEX
35.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
209th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,836
SOCIAL INDEX
85.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
45th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Integration in Immigrants from Uruguay Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 88,799,378 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Czechoslovakia within Immigrant from Uruguay communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.836. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Uruguay within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.409% in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Uruguay corresponds to an increase of 408.8 Immigrants from Czechoslovakia.
Immigrants from Uruguay vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($98,205 compared to $116,165, a difference of 18.3%), median male earnings ($52,860 compared to $62,217, a difference of 17.7%), and per capita income ($43,997 compared to $51,770, a difference of 17.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,302 compared to $54,352, a difference of 3.9%), wage/income gap (24.6% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 10.7%), and median female earnings ($38,945 compared to $43,571, a difference of 11.9%).
| Income Metric | Immigrants from Uruguay | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia |
| Per Capita Income | Average $43,997 | Exceptional $51,770 |
| Median Family Income | Tragic $98,205 | Exceptional $116,165 |
| Median Household Income | Poor $82,560 | Exceptional $95,319 |
| Median Earnings | Fair $45,682 | Exceptional $52,361 |
| Median Male Earnings | Poor $52,860 | Exceptional $62,217 |
| Median Female Earnings | Poor $38,945 | Exceptional $43,571 |
| Householder Age | Under 25 years | Average $52,302 | Exceptional $54,352 |
| Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Poor $91,171 | Exceptional $106,888 |
| Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Poor $96,086 | Exceptional $111,914 |
| Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $56,975 | Exceptional $66,376 |
| Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 24.6% | Tragic 27.3% |
Immigrants from Uruguay vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (12.5% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 29.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.8% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 27.5%), and married-couple family poverty (5.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 24.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.8% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 1.4%), single male poverty (11.9% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 1.9%), and single father poverty (15.6% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 4.0%).
| Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Uruguay | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia |
| Poverty | Poor 12.8% | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Families | Poor 9.5% | Exceptional 7.7% |
| Males | Poor 11.6% | Exceptional 10.0% |
| Females | Poor 14.0% | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 18.8% | Exceptional 19.1% |
| Females 25 to 34 years | Fair 13.7% | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Children Under 5 years | Fair 17.7% | Exceptional 14.8% |
| Children Under 16 years | Fair 16.8% | Exceptional 13.9% |
| Boys Under 16 years | Poor 17.2% | Exceptional 14.4% |
| Girls Under 16 years | Fair 16.7% | Exceptional 14.2% |
| Single Males | Exceptional 11.9% | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Single Females | Good 20.6% | Exceptional 19.0% |
| Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.6% | Good 16.2% |
| Single Mothers | Average 29.1% | Exceptional 27.4% |
| Married Couples | Tragic 5.7% | Exceptional 4.6% |
| Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 12.8% | Exceptional 10.0% |
| Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 14.3% | Excellent 11.7% |
| Receiving Food Stamps | Poor 12.5% | Exceptional 9.6% |
Immigrants from Uruguay vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.5% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 12.3%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 12.0%), and female unemployment (5.5% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.46%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 0.75%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.2%).
| Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Uruguay | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia |
| Unemployment | Fair 5.3% | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Males | Good 5.2% | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Females | Tragic 5.5% | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Youth < 25 | Good 11.5% | Good 11.5% |
| Age | 16 to 19 years | Average 17.6% | Fair 17.8% |
| Age | 20 to 24 years | Excellent 10.1% | Average 10.3% |
| Age | 25 to 29 years | Excellent 6.5% | Good 6.6% |
| Age | 30 to 34 years | Good 5.3% | Excellent 5.3% |
| Age | 35 to 44 years | Poor 4.9% | Excellent 4.5% |
| Age | 45 to 54 years | Fair 4.6% | Excellent 4.4% |
| Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Fair 4.8% |
| Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.1% | Fair 4.9% |
| Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.5% | Good 5.3% |
| Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.2% | Good 5.1% |
| Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.5% | Exceptional 8.4% |
| Women w/ Children < 6 | Average 7.7% | Exceptional 7.0% |
| Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.2% | Fair 9.0% |
| Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 5.9% | Excellent 5.2% |
Immigrants from Uruguay vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.4% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 6.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.75%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 0.19%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.28%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.28%).
| Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Uruguay | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia |
| In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 66.0% | Poor 64.8% |
| In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.1% | Excellent 79.9% |
| In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 34.4% | Average 36.6% |
| In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.6% | Average 75.0% |
| In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Excellent 84.9% | Exceptional 85.4% |
| In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Average 84.7% | Exceptional 85.4% |
| In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Excellent 84.6% | Exceptional 84.8% |
| In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.2% | Exceptional 83.4% |
Immigrants from Uruguay vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 26.5%), births to unmarried women (33.9% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 19.4%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 19.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.9% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 0.72%), average family size (3.23 compared to 3.14, a difference of 2.8%), and family households with children (27.4% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 4.4%).
| Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Uruguay | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia |
| Family Households | Poor 63.9% | Tragic 63.4% |
| Family Households with Children | Fair 27.4% | Tragic 26.2% |
| Married-couple Households | Tragic 44.5% | Exceptional 47.8% |
| Average Family Size | Average 3.23 | Tragic 3.14 |
| Single Father Households | Poor 2.4% | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Single Mother Households | Tragic 6.7% | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Currently Married | Tragic 45.0% | Exceptional 48.4% |
| Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.6% | Exceptional 11.7% |
| Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 33.9% | Exceptional 28.4% |
Immigrants from Uruguay vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in 3 or more vehicles in household (17.1% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 8.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 6.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (51.4% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.1% compared to 88.3%, a difference of 0.25%), no vehicles in household (11.9% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 1.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (51.4% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 5.3%).
| Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Uruguay | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia |
| No Vehicles Available | Tragic 11.9% | Tragic 11.8% |
| 1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 88.1% | Tragic 88.3% |
| 2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 51.4% | Tragic 54.1% |
| 3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 17.1% | Tragic 18.5% |
| 4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 5.4% | Tragic 5.8% |
Immigrants from Uruguay vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 40.3%), no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 27.7%), and professional degree (4.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 27.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.7% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.54%), kindergarten (97.7% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.54%), and 1st grade (97.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.55%).
| Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Uruguay | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia |
| No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.3% | Exceptional 1.8% |
| Nursery School | Tragic 97.7% | Exceptional 98.2% |
| Kindergarten | Tragic 97.7% | Exceptional 98.2% |
| 1st Grade | Tragic 97.6% | Exceptional 98.2% |
| 2nd Grade | Tragic 97.6% | Exceptional 98.1% |
| 3rd Grade | Tragic 97.4% | Exceptional 98.0% |
| 4th Grade | Tragic 97.1% | Exceptional 97.9% |
| 5th Grade | Tragic 96.9% | Exceptional 97.7% |
| 6th Grade | Tragic 96.5% | Exceptional 97.4% |
| 7th Grade | Tragic 95.2% | Exceptional 96.6% |
| 8th Grade | Tragic 94.8% | Exceptional 96.4% |
| 9th Grade | Tragic 93.8% | Exceptional 95.7% |
| 10th Grade | Tragic 92.5% | Exceptional 94.7% |
| 11th Grade | Tragic 91.3% | Exceptional 93.8% |
| 12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.0% | Exceptional 92.7% |
| High School Diploma | Tragic 87.6% | Exceptional 90.9% |
| GED/Equivalency | Tragic 84.4% | Exceptional 87.9% |
| College, Under 1 year | Tragic 63.4% | Exceptional 69.6% |
| College, 1 year or more | Poor 58.1% | Exceptional 64.1% |
| Associate's Degree | Fair 45.8% | Exceptional 51.9% |
| Bachelor's Degree | Average 37.8% | Exceptional 44.0% |
| Master's Degree | Average 15.0% | Exceptional 18.5% |
| Professional Degree | Good 4.6% | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.7% | Exceptional 2.4% |
Immigrants from Uruguay vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 13.4%), vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 10.8%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (11.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.36%), ambulatory disability (5.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 0.76%), and male disability (10.8% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 0.97%).
| Disability Metric | Immigrants from Uruguay | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia |
| Disability | Exceptional 11.3% | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Males | Exceptional 10.8% | Excellent 10.9% |
| Females | Exceptional 11.7% | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Age | Under 5 years | Average 1.2% | Excellent 1.2% |
| Age | 5 to 17 years | Fair 5.6% | Exceptional 5.2% |
| Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.2% | Exceptional 6.3% |
| Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.3% | Exceptional 10.0% |
| Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 22.6% | Exceptional 21.0% |
| Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.4% | Exceptional 45.1% |
| Vision | Poor 2.2% | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Hearing | Exceptional 2.7% | Poor 3.1% |
| Cognitive | Exceptional 17.0% | Exceptional 16.2% |
| Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.9% | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Self-Care | Excellent 2.4% | Exceptional 2.4% |