Immigrants from Northern Europe vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Northern Europe
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Northern Europe

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia

Excellent
Excellent
8,913
SOCIAL INDEX
86.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
38th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,836
SOCIAL INDEX
85.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
45th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Integration in Immigrants from Northern Europe Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 191,702,174 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Czechoslovakia within Immigrant from Northern Europe communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.553. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Northern Europe within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.163% in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Northern Europe corresponds to an increase of 162.5 Immigrants from Czechoslovakia.
Immigrants from Northern Europe Integration in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Communities

Immigrants from Northern Europe vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Europe and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($117,930 compared to $111,914, a difference of 5.4%), median family income ($121,840 compared to $116,165, a difference of 4.9%), and median household income ($99,813 compared to $95,319, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,571 compared to $54,352, a difference of 0.40%), median female earnings ($44,366 compared to $43,571, a difference of 1.8%), and median earnings ($53,872 compared to $52,361, a difference of 2.9%).
Immigrants from Northern Europe vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Income
Income MetricImmigrants from Northern EuropeImmigrants from Czechoslovakia
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$54,159
Exceptional
$51,770
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$121,840
Exceptional
$116,165
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$99,813
Exceptional
$95,319
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$53,872
Exceptional
$52,361
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$64,987
Exceptional
$62,217
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$44,366
Exceptional
$43,571
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,571
Exceptional
$54,352
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$111,676
Exceptional
$106,888
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$117,930
Exceptional
$111,914
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$69,003
Exceptional
$66,376
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.5%
Tragic
27.3%

Immigrants from Northern Europe vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Europe and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.2% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 8.2%), receiving food stamps (9.2% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 5.2%), and family poverty (7.4% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.020%), single mother poverty (27.3% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.20%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (14.8% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 0.24%).
Immigrants from Northern Europe vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from Northern EuropeImmigrants from Czechoslovakia
Poverty
Exceptional
10.7%
Exceptional
11.0%
Families
Exceptional
7.4%
Exceptional
7.7%
Males
Exceptional
9.7%
Exceptional
10.0%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Exceptional
11.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.4%
Exceptional
19.1%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.1%
Exceptional
12.1%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.8%
Exceptional
14.8%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.6%
Exceptional
13.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.9%
Exceptional
14.4%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.8%
Exceptional
14.2%
Single Males
Excellent
12.5%
Exceptional
12.1%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.2%
Exceptional
19.0%
Single Fathers
Fair
16.5%
Good
16.2%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.3%
Exceptional
27.4%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
4.6%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.8%
Exceptional
10.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.3%
Excellent
11.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.2%
Exceptional
9.6%

Immigrants from Northern Europe vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Europe and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.9% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 5.3%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.4% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 2.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.090%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 0.18%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.19%).
Immigrants from Northern Europe vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from Northern EuropeImmigrants from Czechoslovakia
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
5.0%
Males
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
5.1%
Females
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
5.0%
Youth < 25
Good
11.5%
Good
11.5%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Good
17.4%
Fair
17.8%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Poor
10.4%
Average
10.3%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Average
6.6%
Good
6.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Good
5.3%
Excellent
5.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Excellent
4.5%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Excellent
4.4%
Excellent
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Good
4.8%
Fair
4.8%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Average
4.8%
Fair
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Average
5.4%
Good
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Good
5.1%
Good
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Fair
8.9%
Exceptional
8.4%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.2%
Exceptional
7.0%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Good
8.9%
Fair
9.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.1%
Excellent
5.2%

Immigrants from Northern Europe vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Europe and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (83.1% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.39%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 0.25%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.25%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.10%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.12%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 0.17%).
Immigrants from Northern Europe vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from Northern EuropeImmigrants from Czechoslovakia
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.7%
Poor
64.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Good
79.7%
Excellent
79.9%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Average
36.5%
Average
36.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Fair
74.8%
Average
75.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.2%
Exceptional
85.4%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.3%
Exceptional
85.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.7%
Exceptional
84.8%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Excellent
83.1%
Exceptional
83.4%

Immigrants from Northern Europe vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Europe and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in married-couple households (48.6% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 1.7%), family households with children (26.7% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 1.7%), and currently married (48.8% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 0.99%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.20%), average family size (3.13 compared to 3.14, a difference of 0.51%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 0.51%).
Immigrants from Northern Europe vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from Northern EuropeImmigrants from Czechoslovakia
Family Households
Tragic
63.8%
Tragic
63.4%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.7%
Tragic
26.2%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.6%
Exceptional
47.8%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.13
Tragic
3.14
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.0%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.3%
Exceptional
5.3%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.8%
Exceptional
48.4%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.6%
Exceptional
11.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
28.6%
Exceptional
28.4%

Immigrants from Northern Europe vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Europe and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.7% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 10.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 8.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.5% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.5% compared to 88.3%, a difference of 1.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.1% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 3.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.5% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 5.6%).
Immigrants from Northern Europe vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from Northern EuropeImmigrants from Czechoslovakia
No Vehicles Available
Fair
10.7%
Tragic
11.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Fair
89.5%
Tragic
88.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Good
56.1%
Tragic
54.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Average
19.5%
Tragic
18.5%
4+ Vehicles Available
Fair
6.2%
Tragic
5.8%

Immigrants from Northern Europe vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Europe and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 9.2%), doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 8.9%), and professional degree (6.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.17%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.17%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.17%).
Immigrants from Northern Europe vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from Northern EuropeImmigrants from Czechoslovakia
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Exceptional
1.8%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.2%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.1%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.0%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
97.9%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
97.7%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Exceptional
97.4%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.9%
Exceptional
96.6%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.7%
Exceptional
96.4%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.0%
Exceptional
95.7%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.2%
Exceptional
94.7%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.2%
Exceptional
93.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.1%
Exceptional
92.7%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.4%
Exceptional
90.9%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.5%
Exceptional
87.9%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
71.1%
Exceptional
69.6%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
65.6%
Exceptional
64.1%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
53.5%
Exceptional
51.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
45.6%
Exceptional
44.0%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
19.5%
Exceptional
18.5%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
6.2%
Exceptional
5.8%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.6%
Exceptional
2.4%

Immigrants from Northern Europe vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Europe and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 10.7%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.5% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 3.7%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (21.0% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 0.12%), disability age over 75 (45.2% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 0.16%), and female disability (11.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.20%).
Immigrants from Northern Europe vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from Northern EuropeImmigrants from Czechoslovakia
Disability
Exceptional
11.3%
Exceptional
11.2%
Males
Good
11.1%
Excellent
10.9%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Exceptional
11.6%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.3%
Excellent
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.3%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Good
6.5%
Exceptional
6.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.0%
Exceptional
21.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.2%
Exceptional
45.1%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Tragic
3.2%
Poor
3.1%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.3%
Exceptional
16.2%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.8%
Exceptional
5.8%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Exceptional
2.4%