Kiowa vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 43,236,887 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Czechoslovakia within Kiowa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.509. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Kiowa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.043% in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Kiowa corresponds to an increase of 42.7 Immigrants from Czechoslovakia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($74,815 compared to $111,914, a difference of 49.6%), per capita income ($35,102 compared to $51,770, a difference of 47.5%), and median household income ($65,914 compared to $95,319, a difference of 44.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (23.6% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 15.5%), householder income under 25 years ($44,733 compared to $54,352, a difference of 21.5%), and median female earnings ($34,074 compared to $43,571, a difference of 27.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (23.7% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 67.5%), child poverty under the age of 5 (24.5% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 65.6%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (19.7% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 62.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.3% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 5.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.8% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 27.6%), and single mother poverty (35.5% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 29.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (25.2% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 42.0%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 27.4%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (6.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 26.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.5% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 1.5%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 3.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 35-44 (79.2% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 7.1%), in labor force | age 30-34 (79.8% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 7.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (78.3% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (37.2% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 1.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.2% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (62.4% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (43.1% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 51.9%), single father households (2.8% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 37.2%), and single mother households (7.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 34.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (61.4% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 3.3%), family households with children (27.3% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 4.0%), and average family size (3.27 compared to 3.14, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 7.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.5% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 5.6%), and no vehicles in household (11.5% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.6% compared to 88.3%, a difference of 0.27%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 0.47%), and no vehicles in household (11.5% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 88.8%), master's degree (10.8% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 71.3%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 59.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (96.3% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 0.050%), 7th grade (96.7% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 0.10%), and 4th grade (98.0% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.17%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (17.4% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 74.1%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 61.1%), and disability age 65 to 74 (32.6% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 55.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.7% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 15.4%), disability age over 75 (54.2% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 20.2%), and disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 23.4%).