Turkish vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 151,336,411 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Czechoslovakia within Turkish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.269. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Turks within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.007% in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Turks corresponds to an increase of 6.9 Immigrants from Czechoslovakia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Turkish and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($117,814 compared to $111,914, a difference of 5.3%), median family income ($121,202 compared to $116,165, a difference of 4.3%), and median household income ($99,389 compared to $95,319, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,266 compared to $54,352, a difference of 0.16%), per capita income ($52,391 compared to $51,770, a difference of 1.2%), and wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Turkish and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.4% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 6.3%), married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 6.2%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (13.6% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty (11.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.0%), poverty (11.0% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 0.080%), and single male poverty (12.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.080%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Turkish and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 6.6%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 5.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.0% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 0.010%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.41%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.3% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 0.53%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Turkish and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.4% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 3.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (73.9% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.6% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.24%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.35%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.7% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.36%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Turkish and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in family households with children (27.4% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 4.6%), divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 4.5%), and births to unmarried women (27.4% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.8% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 0.13%), family households (63.6% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 0.33%), and average family size (3.16 compared to 3.14, a difference of 0.72%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Turkish and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.7% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 0.92%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 0.76%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.3% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 0.37%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.4% compared to 88.3%, a difference of 0.10%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 0.20%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.3% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 0.37%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Turkish and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 12.8%), master's degree (19.9% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 7.3%), and professional degree (6.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.010%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.020%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.020%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Turkish and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 10.6%), ambulatory disability (5.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 6.3%), and vision disability (1.9% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (21.0% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 0.15%), disability age over 75 (45.7% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 1.2%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.9%).