Immigrants from Oceania vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Oceania
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Oceania
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
6,183
SOCIAL INDEX
59.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
161st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,836
SOCIAL INDEX
85.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
45th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Integration in Immigrants from Oceania Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 157,381,288 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Czechoslovakia within Immigrant from Oceania communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.814. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Oceania within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.026% in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Oceania corresponds to an increase of 25.7 Immigrants from Czechoslovakia.
Immigrants from Oceania vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,220 compared to $51,770, a difference of 14.5%), median male earnings ($55,712 compared to $62,217, a difference of 11.7%), and median earnings ($47,617 compared to $52,361, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,680 compared to $54,352, a difference of 1.3%), householder income over 65 years ($64,416 compared to $66,376, a difference of 3.0%), and wage/income gap (25.6% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 6.4%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from Oceania | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia |
Per Capita Income | Excellent $45,220 | Exceptional $51,770 |
Median Family Income | Excellent $106,453 | Exceptional $116,165 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $89,100 | Exceptional $95,319 |
Median Earnings | Excellent $47,617 | Exceptional $52,361 |
Median Male Earnings | Good $55,712 | Exceptional $62,217 |
Median Female Earnings | Good $40,297 | Exceptional $43,571 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $53,680 | Exceptional $54,352 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Excellent $97,623 | Exceptional $106,888 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Excellent $103,705 | Exceptional $111,914 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $64,416 | Exceptional $66,376 |
Wage/Income Gap | Average 25.6% | Tragic 27.3% |
Immigrants from Oceania vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.4% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 18.0%), child poverty under the age of 5 (16.9% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 14.4%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (15.9% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.50%), single male poverty (12.4% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 2.7%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.7% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 3.3%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Oceania | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia |
Poverty | Average 12.3% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Families | Good 8.7% | Exceptional 7.7% |
Males | Average 11.2% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Females | Average 13.3% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Excellent 19.7% | Exceptional 19.1% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Average 13.5% | Exceptional 12.1% |
Children Under 5 years | Good 16.9% | Exceptional 14.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Good 15.9% | Exceptional 13.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Good 16.0% | Exceptional 14.4% |
Girls Under 16 years | Good 16.1% | Exceptional 14.2% |
Single Males | Exceptional 12.4% | Exceptional 12.1% |
Single Females | Good 20.7% | Exceptional 19.0% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.4% | Good 16.2% |
Single Mothers | Good 28.7% | Exceptional 27.4% |
Married Couples | Good 5.0% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Excellent 10.4% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Excellent 11.7% | Excellent 11.7% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Good 11.4% | Exceptional 9.6% |
Immigrants from Oceania vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 11.7%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 6.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.21%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.4% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.72%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.89%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Oceania | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia |
Unemployment | Good 5.2% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Average 5.3% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Females | Good 5.2% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Youth < 25 | Excellent 11.4% | Good 11.5% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Excellent 17.2% | Fair 17.8% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 10.0% | Average 10.3% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.4% | Good 6.6% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Good 5.4% | Excellent 5.3% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Fair 4.8% | Excellent 4.5% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Excellent 4.4% | Excellent 4.4% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Fair 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Fair 4.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Good 5.3% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 5.0% | Good 5.1% |
Seniors > 75 | Poor 9.0% | Exceptional 8.4% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Good 7.5% | Exceptional 7.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.1% | Fair 9.0% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Excellent 5.3% | Excellent 5.2% |
Immigrants from Oceania vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.9% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 3.6%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.1% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 0.73%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.9% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 1.1%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Oceania | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Excellent 65.5% | Poor 64.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Poor 79.3% | Excellent 79.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 37.9% | Average 36.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 76.1% | Average 75.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 84.2% | Exceptional 85.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 84.0% | Exceptional 85.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.9% | Exceptional 84.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 82.1% | Exceptional 83.4% |
Immigrants from Oceania vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 20.8%), single mother households (6.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 18.0%), and births to unmarried women (30.6% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (46.9% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 1.8%), divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 2.0%), and family households (64.9% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 2.3%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Oceania | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia |
Family Households | Exceptional 64.9% | Tragic 63.4% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.1% | Tragic 26.2% |
Married-couple Households | Good 46.9% | Exceptional 47.8% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.29 | Tragic 3.14 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.5% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Single Mother Households | Average 6.3% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Currently Married | Average 46.5% | Exceptional 48.4% |
Divorced or Separated | Good 11.9% | Exceptional 11.7% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Excellent 30.6% | Exceptional 28.4% |
Immigrants from Oceania vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 32.0%), no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 21.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 18.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 88.3%, a difference of 2.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 6.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 18.0%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Oceania | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia |
No Vehicles Available | Excellent 9.7% | Tragic 11.8% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 90.4% | Tragic 88.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 57.5% | Tragic 54.1% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.8% | Tragic 18.5% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.6% | Tragic 5.8% |
Immigrants from Oceania vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 27.4%), master's degree (14.7% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 26.4%), and doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 23.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.42%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.42%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.42%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Oceania | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia |
No Schooling Completed | Poor 2.2% | Exceptional 1.8% |
Nursery School | Poor 97.8% | Exceptional 98.2% |
Kindergarten | Poor 97.8% | Exceptional 98.2% |
1st Grade | Poor 97.8% | Exceptional 98.2% |
2nd Grade | Poor 97.7% | Exceptional 98.1% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.6% | Exceptional 98.0% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.3% | Exceptional 97.9% |
5th Grade | Poor 97.1% | Exceptional 97.7% |
6th Grade | Poor 96.8% | Exceptional 97.4% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.7% | Exceptional 96.6% |
8th Grade | Tragic 95.3% | Exceptional 96.4% |
9th Grade | Poor 94.5% | Exceptional 95.7% |
10th Grade | Poor 93.4% | Exceptional 94.7% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.2% | Exceptional 93.8% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Fair 90.9% | Exceptional 92.7% |
High School Diploma | Fair 88.8% | Exceptional 90.9% |
GED/Equivalency | Fair 85.5% | Exceptional 87.9% |
College, Under 1 year | Average 65.6% | Exceptional 69.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Average 59.4% | Exceptional 64.1% |
Associate's Degree | Fair 45.8% | Exceptional 51.9% |
Bachelor's Degree | Fair 37.3% | Exceptional 44.0% |
Master's Degree | Fair 14.7% | Exceptional 18.5% |
Professional Degree | Good 4.6% | Exceptional 5.8% |
Doctorate Degree | Good 1.9% | Exceptional 2.4% |
Immigrants from Oceania vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (24.0% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 14.1%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.4% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 14.0%), and cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 2.2%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 2.9%), and ambulatory disability (6.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 4.4%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from Oceania | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia |
Disability | Fair 11.8% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Males | Fair 11.4% | Excellent 10.9% |
Females | Good 12.1% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.2% | Excellent 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.4% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Fair 6.7% | Exceptional 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Fair 11.4% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Poor 24.0% | Exceptional 21.0% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.0% | Exceptional 45.1% |
Vision | Average 2.2% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.2% | Poor 3.1% |
Cognitive | Tragic 17.6% | Exceptional 16.2% |
Ambulatory | Good 6.1% | Exceptional 5.8% |
Self-Care | Fair 2.5% | Exceptional 2.4% |