Ghanaian vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 111,263,799 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Czechoslovakia within Ghanaian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.640. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ghanaians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.044% in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ghanaians corresponds to an increase of 44.5 Immigrants from Czechoslovakia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($42,164 compared to $51,770, a difference of 22.8%), wage/income gap (22.3% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 22.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($90,137 compared to $106,888, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,594 compared to $54,352, a difference of 3.3%), median female earnings ($40,429 compared to $43,571, a difference of 7.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($60,043 compared to $66,376, a difference of 10.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.0% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 44.7%), family poverty (10.3% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 34.0%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (18.6% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 33.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.7% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 2.9%), single mother poverty (29.4% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 7.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.8% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 8.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment (6.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 19.4%), male unemployment (6.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 19.3%), and female unemployment (5.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 18.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.4% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 0.76%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.2%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (67.1% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 3.7%), in labor force | age 16-19 (35.3% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.3% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 0.92%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.060%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.080%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 0.24%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 47.4%), births to unmarried women (34.3% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 20.6%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 19.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.5% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 0.060%), divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 3.2%), and average family size (3.29 compared to 3.14, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (16.4% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 39.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (16.4% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 13.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (48.0% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (83.6% compared to 88.3%, a difference of 5.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 10.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (48.0% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 12.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.6% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 40.4%), professional degree (4.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 37.0%), and doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 28.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.78%), kindergarten (97.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.78%), and 1st grade (97.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.79%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.5% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 22.1%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.7% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 17.0%), and disability age 65 to 74 (24.1% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (10.8% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 0.88%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 0.95%), and disability (11.5% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 2.0%).