Immigrants from the Azores vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from the Azores
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from the Azores

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia

Poor
Excellent
1,552
SOCIAL INDEX
13.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
302nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,836
SOCIAL INDEX
85.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
45th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Integration in Immigrants from the Azores Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 28,530,965 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Czechoslovakia within Immigrant from the Azores communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.031. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from the Azores within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from the Azores corresponds to a decrease of 2.9 Immigrants from Czechoslovakia.
Immigrants from the Azores Integration in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Communities

Immigrants from the Azores vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from the Azores and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,608 compared to $51,770, a difference of 30.7%), householder income over 65 years ($52,121 compared to $66,376, a difference of 27.4%), and median family income ($95,402 compared to $116,165, a difference of 21.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 0.39%), householder income under 25 years ($52,621 compared to $54,352, a difference of 3.3%), and median female earnings ($38,573 compared to $43,571, a difference of 13.0%).
Immigrants from the Azores vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Income
Income MetricImmigrants from the AzoresImmigrants from Czechoslovakia
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$39,608
Exceptional
$51,770
Median Family Income
Tragic
$95,402
Exceptional
$116,165
Median Household Income
Tragic
$80,357
Exceptional
$95,319
Median Earnings
Fair
$45,812
Exceptional
$52,361
Median Male Earnings
Fair
$53,503
Exceptional
$62,217
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$38,573
Exceptional
$43,571
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Good
$52,621
Exceptional
$54,352
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Fair
$92,322
Exceptional
$106,888
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$94,138
Exceptional
$111,914
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$52,121
Exceptional
$66,376
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.2%
Tragic
27.3%

Immigrants from the Azores vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from the Azores and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (16.4% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 70.0%), family poverty (10.3% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 33.9%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (18.9% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 31.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.9% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 1.6%), single male poverty (13.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 9.1%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (16.7% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 14.5%).
Immigrants from the Azores vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from the AzoresImmigrants from Czechoslovakia
Poverty
Tragic
13.1%
Exceptional
11.0%
Families
Tragic
10.3%
Exceptional
7.7%
Males
Tragic
12.0%
Exceptional
10.0%
Females
Tragic
14.2%
Exceptional
11.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
16.7%
Exceptional
19.1%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
15.8%
Exceptional
12.1%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
18.9%
Exceptional
14.8%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
17.5%
Exceptional
13.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
18.9%
Exceptional
14.4%
Girls Under 16 years
Fair
16.8%
Exceptional
14.2%
Single Males
Tragic
13.2%
Exceptional
12.1%
Single Females
Tragic
23.5%
Exceptional
19.0%
Single Fathers
Excellent
15.9%
Good
16.2%
Single Mothers
Tragic
32.2%
Exceptional
27.4%
Married Couples
Fair
5.4%
Exceptional
4.6%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
12.9%
Exceptional
10.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
15.2%
Excellent
11.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
16.4%
Exceptional
9.6%

Immigrants from the Azores vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from the Azores and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 31.0%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.2% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 30.9%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.7% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 30.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 1.7%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 2.6%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.2% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 6.0%).
Immigrants from the Azores vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from the AzoresImmigrants from Czechoslovakia
Unemployment
Tragic
6.1%
Exceptional
5.0%
Males
Tragic
6.4%
Exceptional
5.1%
Females
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
5.0%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.2%
Good
11.5%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
19.8%
Fair
17.8%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Excellent
10.2%
Average
10.3%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
8.1%
Good
6.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.9%
Excellent
5.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.8%
Excellent
4.5%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.7%
Excellent
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.8%
Fair
4.8%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.0%
Fair
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.2%
Good
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.3%
Good
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.7%
Exceptional
8.4%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.2%
Exceptional
7.0%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.3%
Fair
9.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.0%
Excellent
5.2%

Immigrants from the Azores vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from the Azores and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.7% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 14.1%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.5% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.1% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.6% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 1.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.6% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.8% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 2.7%).
Immigrants from the Azores vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from the AzoresImmigrants from Czechoslovakia
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
63.6%
Poor
64.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
77.8%
Excellent
79.9%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
41.7%
Average
36.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.2%
Average
75.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.1%
Exceptional
85.4%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.5%
Exceptional
85.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.6%
Exceptional
84.8%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
80.1%
Exceptional
83.4%

Immigrants from the Azores vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from the Azores and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 41.6%), births to unmarried women (39.6% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 39.4%), and single father households (2.8% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 38.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.21 compared to 3.14, a difference of 2.1%), family households (65.6% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 3.5%), and divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 5.1%).
Immigrants from the Azores vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from the AzoresImmigrants from Czechoslovakia
Family Households
Exceptional
65.6%
Tragic
63.4%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.1%
Tragic
26.2%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
45.2%
Exceptional
47.8%
Average Family Size
Fair
3.21
Tragic
3.14
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.8%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.5%
Exceptional
5.3%
Currently Married
Tragic
45.1%
Exceptional
48.4%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.3%
Exceptional
11.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
39.6%
Exceptional
28.4%

Immigrants from the Azores vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from the Azores and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 30.6%), no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 21.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 88.3%, a difference of 2.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.4% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 4.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 16.2%).
Immigrants from the Azores vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from the AzoresImmigrants from Czechoslovakia
No Vehicles Available
Excellent
9.7%
Tragic
11.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
90.4%
Tragic
88.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
56.4%
Tragic
54.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.5%
Tragic
18.5%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.5%
Tragic
5.8%

Immigrants from the Azores vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from the Azores and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (2.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 105.9%), master's degree (10.2% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 81.3%), and doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 74.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.3%), kindergarten (97.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.3%), and 1st grade (96.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.3%).
Immigrants from the Azores vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from the AzoresImmigrants from Czechoslovakia
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
3.0%
Exceptional
1.8%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.0%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.0%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Tragic
96.9%
Exceptional
98.2%
2nd Grade
Tragic
96.8%
Exceptional
98.1%
3rd Grade
Tragic
96.6%
Exceptional
98.0%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.1%
Exceptional
97.9%
5th Grade
Tragic
95.1%
Exceptional
97.7%
6th Grade
Tragic
94.7%
Exceptional
97.4%
7th Grade
Tragic
93.0%
Exceptional
96.6%
8th Grade
Tragic
92.5%
Exceptional
96.4%
9th Grade
Tragic
90.8%
Exceptional
95.7%
10th Grade
Tragic
89.0%
Exceptional
94.7%
11th Grade
Tragic
87.2%
Exceptional
93.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
85.3%
Exceptional
92.7%
High School Diploma
Tragic
82.8%
Exceptional
90.9%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
78.7%
Exceptional
87.9%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
54.7%
Exceptional
69.6%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
48.4%
Exceptional
64.1%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
35.6%
Exceptional
51.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
27.3%
Exceptional
44.0%
Master's Degree
Tragic
10.2%
Exceptional
18.5%
Professional Degree
Tragic
2.8%
Exceptional
5.8%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.4%
Exceptional
2.4%

Immigrants from the Azores vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from the Azores and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (2.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 86.9%), disability age 35 to 64 (14.3% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 43.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.5% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 35.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 10.4%), disability age over 75 (50.9% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 12.8%), and hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 19.4%).
Immigrants from the Azores vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from the AzoresImmigrants from Czechoslovakia
Disability
Tragic
14.2%
Exceptional
11.2%
Males
Tragic
13.4%
Excellent
10.9%
Females
Tragic
14.9%
Exceptional
11.6%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
2.2%
Excellent
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.7%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
8.5%
Exceptional
6.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
14.3%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
26.0%
Exceptional
21.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
50.9%
Exceptional
45.1%
Vision
Tragic
2.4%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Tragic
3.7%
Poor
3.1%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.9%
Exceptional
16.2%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.1%
Exceptional
5.8%
Self-Care
Tragic
3.0%
Exceptional
2.4%