Brazilian vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 163,981,641 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Czechoslovakia within Brazilian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.173. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Brazilians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Brazilians corresponds to a decrease of 2.8 Immigrants from Czechoslovakia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($46,700 compared to $51,770, a difference of 10.9%), median male earnings ($56,837 compared to $62,217, a difference of 9.5%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($98,267 compared to $106,888, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,335 compared to $54,352, a difference of 0.030%), wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 2.0%), and median household income ($88,934 compared to $95,319, a difference of 7.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.1% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 14.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.3% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 13.3%), and family poverty (8.6% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.6% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 2.6%), single male poverty (11.8% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 2.8%), and single mother poverty (28.3% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 11.5%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.3% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 9.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.27%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 0.54%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.88%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (66.6% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 2.9%), in labor force | age 16-19 (37.5% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.8% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 1.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.3% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.16%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.24%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 17.4%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 9.6%), and births to unmarried women (30.4% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.9% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 0.70%), average family size (3.18 compared to 3.14, a difference of 1.3%), and divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 13.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 7.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (53.8% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 0.64%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 88.3%, a difference of 1.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 16.7%), doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 13.8%), and no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.23%), 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.24%), and 2nd grade (97.9% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.25%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 21.8%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 13.9%), and hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (10.9% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 0.37%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 0.99%), and disability (11.4% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 1.1%).