Hawaiian vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Community Comparison

COMPARE

Hawaiian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Hawaiians

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia

Fair
Excellent
3,537
SOCIAL INDEX
32.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
218th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,836
SOCIAL INDEX
85.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
45th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Integration in Hawaiian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 152,396,971 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Czechoslovakia within Hawaiian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.637. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hawaiians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.004% in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Hawaiians corresponds to an increase of 4.0 Immigrants from Czechoslovakia.
Hawaiian Integration in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Communities

Hawaiian vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,403 compared to $51,770, a difference of 31.4%), median male earnings ($50,488 compared to $62,217, a difference of 23.2%), and median earnings ($43,673 compared to $52,361, a difference of 19.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($64,920 compared to $66,376, a difference of 2.2%), householder income under 25 years ($53,078 compared to $54,352, a difference of 2.4%), and wage/income gap (24.9% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 9.6%).
Hawaiian vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Income
Income MetricHawaiianImmigrants from Czechoslovakia
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$39,403
Exceptional
$51,770
Median Family Income
Poor
$98,869
Exceptional
$116,165
Median Household Income
Average
$84,729
Exceptional
$95,319
Median Earnings
Tragic
$43,673
Exceptional
$52,361
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$50,488
Exceptional
$62,217
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$37,497
Exceptional
$43,571
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Excellent
$53,078
Exceptional
$54,352
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Poor
$90,722
Exceptional
$106,888
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Fair
$98,778
Exceptional
$111,914
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$64,920
Exceptional
$66,376
Wage/Income Gap
Excellent
24.9%
Tragic
27.3%

Hawaiian vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (12.9% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 34.0%), child poverty under the age of 16 (16.4% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 18.2%), and family poverty (9.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.7% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 2.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.3% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 2.5%), and single male poverty (12.6% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 4.4%).
Hawaiian vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Poverty
Poverty MetricHawaiianImmigrants from Czechoslovakia
Poverty
Fair
12.5%
Exceptional
11.0%
Families
Average
9.0%
Exceptional
7.7%
Males
Fair
11.4%
Exceptional
10.0%
Females
Fair
13.6%
Exceptional
11.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.7%
Exceptional
19.1%
Females 25 to 34 years
Poor
14.1%
Exceptional
12.1%
Children Under 5 years
Average
17.4%
Exceptional
14.8%
Children Under 16 years
Fair
16.4%
Exceptional
13.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Average
16.5%
Exceptional
14.4%
Girls Under 16 years
Average
16.6%
Exceptional
14.2%
Single Males
Good
12.6%
Exceptional
12.1%
Single Females
Fair
21.2%
Exceptional
19.0%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.1%
Good
16.2%
Single Mothers
Average
29.2%
Exceptional
27.4%
Married Couples
Good
5.1%
Exceptional
4.6%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.3%
Exceptional
10.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.1%
Excellent
11.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
12.9%
Exceptional
9.6%

Hawaiian vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 18.0%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.2% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 15.9%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.4% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 0.27%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.9% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 0.87%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.4%).
Hawaiian vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Unemployment
Unemployment MetricHawaiianImmigrants from Czechoslovakia
Unemployment
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
5.0%
Males
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
5.1%
Females
Fair
5.4%
Exceptional
5.0%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.0%
Good
11.5%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Poor
17.9%
Fair
17.8%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Fair
10.4%
Average
10.3%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Poor
6.8%
Good
6.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
5.9%
Excellent
5.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.3%
Excellent
4.5%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Fair
4.5%
Excellent
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Poor
4.9%
Fair
4.8%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Fair
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.7%
Good
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.4%
Good
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.3%
Exceptional
8.4%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.2%
Exceptional
7.0%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.1%
Fair
9.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Average
5.5%
Excellent
5.2%

Hawaiian vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.4% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 5.0%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.0% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.0% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 0.090%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.7% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.2% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 1.9%).
Hawaiian vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricHawaiianImmigrants from Czechoslovakia
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.7%
Poor
64.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
78.7%
Excellent
79.9%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.4%
Average
36.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.0%
Average
75.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.0%
Exceptional
85.4%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
83.0%
Exceptional
85.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.2%
Exceptional
84.8%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.5%
Exceptional
83.4%

Hawaiian vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.7% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 30.8%), single mother households (6.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 23.9%), and births to unmarried women (33.2% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 17.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.8% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 0.11%), divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 3.1%), and currently married (46.6% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 3.7%).
Hawaiian vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Family Structure
Family Structure MetricHawaiianImmigrants from Czechoslovakia
Family Households
Exceptional
67.4%
Tragic
63.4%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.7%
Tragic
26.2%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
47.8%
Exceptional
47.8%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.41
Tragic
3.14
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.7%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Poor
6.6%
Exceptional
5.3%
Currently Married
Average
46.6%
Exceptional
48.4%
Divorced or Separated
Average
12.1%
Exceptional
11.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Poor
33.2%
Exceptional
28.4%

Hawaiian vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 54.6%), no vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 46.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.3% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 31.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.0% compared to 88.3%, a difference of 4.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.4% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 11.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.3% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 31.3%).
Hawaiian vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricHawaiianImmigrants from Czechoslovakia
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.0%
Tragic
11.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.0%
Tragic
88.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
60.4%
Tragic
54.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
24.3%
Tragic
18.5%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.9%
Tragic
5.8%

Hawaiian vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 69.1%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 61.6%), and master's degree (11.6% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 60.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.33%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.33%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.33%).
Hawaiian vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Education Level
Education Level MetricHawaiianImmigrants from Czechoslovakia
No Schooling Completed
Fair
2.2%
Exceptional
1.8%
Nursery School
Fair
97.9%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Fair
97.9%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Fair
97.9%
Exceptional
98.2%
2nd Grade
Fair
97.8%
Exceptional
98.1%
3rd Grade
Fair
97.7%
Exceptional
98.0%
4th Grade
Fair
97.4%
Exceptional
97.9%
5th Grade
Fair
97.2%
Exceptional
97.7%
6th Grade
Fair
96.9%
Exceptional
97.4%
7th Grade
Poor
95.8%
Exceptional
96.6%
8th Grade
Poor
95.5%
Exceptional
96.4%
9th Grade
Fair
94.7%
Exceptional
95.7%
10th Grade
Fair
93.5%
Exceptional
94.7%
11th Grade
Fair
92.3%
Exceptional
93.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Poor
90.8%
Exceptional
92.7%
High School Diploma
Poor
88.6%
Exceptional
90.9%
GED/Equivalency
Poor
85.0%
Exceptional
87.9%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
62.1%
Exceptional
69.6%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
55.6%
Exceptional
64.1%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
40.9%
Exceptional
51.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
31.6%
Exceptional
44.0%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.6%
Exceptional
18.5%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.4%
Exceptional
5.8%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
2.4%

Hawaiian vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (12.3% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 23.7%), disability age 65 to 74 (25.5% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 21.6%), and vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 1.9%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 6.0%), and cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 8.5%).
Hawaiian vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Disability
Disability MetricHawaiianImmigrants from Czechoslovakia
Disability
Tragic
12.5%
Exceptional
11.2%
Males
Tragic
12.3%
Excellent
10.9%
Females
Tragic
12.7%
Exceptional
11.6%
Age | Under 5 years
Good
1.2%
Excellent
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Good
5.5%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
6.9%
Exceptional
6.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
12.3%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
25.5%
Exceptional
21.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
49.2%
Exceptional
45.1%
Vision
Tragic
2.3%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Tragic
3.5%
Poor
3.1%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.6%
Exceptional
16.2%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.5%
Exceptional
5.8%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.4%