Asian vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 194,975,973 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Czechoslovakia within Asian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.227. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Asians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.000% in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Asians corresponds to a decrease of 0.4 Immigrants from Czechoslovakia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Asian and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($101,681 compared to $95,319, a difference of 6.7%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($118,426 compared to $111,914, a difference of 5.8%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($112,666 compared to $106,888, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.9% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 1.3%), median female earnings ($44,586 compared to $43,571, a difference of 2.3%), and median earnings ($53,690 compared to $52,361, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Asian and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (14.6% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 11.3%), single male poverty (11.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 7.9%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (13.5% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (10.0% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 0.070%), poverty (11.0% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 0.10%), and female poverty (11.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.22%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Asian and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.0% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 13.4%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.7% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 5.4%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.9% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.45%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.4% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.68%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.71%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Asian and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 7.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (73.7% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.060%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.14%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.2% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 0.31%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Asian and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in family households with children (29.1% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 10.8%), divorced or separated (10.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 10.0%), and births to unmarried women (26.8% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.4% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 0.11%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 3.3%), and married-couple households (49.5% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Asian and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 31.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 21.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.1% compared to 88.3%, a difference of 3.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.0% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 5.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 12.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Asian and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 31.7%), professional degree (5.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 5.7%), and doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (64.2% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 0.17%), college, under 1 year (69.4% compared to 69.6%, a difference of 0.25%), and associate's degree (52.1% compared to 51.9%, a difference of 0.46%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Asian and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 13.7%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 10.2%), and male disability (10.0% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 1.3%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.4% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 1.8%), and cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 3.3%).