Houma vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 27,840,525 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Czechoslovakia within Houma communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.988. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Houma within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.225% in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Houma corresponds to an increase of 224.8 Immigrants from Czechoslovakia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Houma and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($32,996 compared to $51,770, a difference of 56.9%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($72,093 compared to $111,914, a difference of 55.2%), and median family income ($76,188 compared to $116,165, a difference of 52.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($44,356 compared to $54,352, a difference of 22.5%), median male earnings ($50,547 compared to $62,217, a difference of 23.1%), and median earnings ($38,949 compared to $52,361, a difference of 34.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Houma and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (23.5% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 94.1%), family poverty (14.6% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 90.6%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (22.7% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 87.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (26.2% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 37.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 38.6%), and married-couple family poverty (6.4% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 39.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Houma and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (7.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 73.6%), male unemployment (7.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 39.2%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (12.5% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 38.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.22%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 7.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 8.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Houma and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (74.1% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 12.6%), in labor force | age 20-64 (72.7% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 9.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (59.5% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.7% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 1.8%), in labor force | age 16-19 (35.6% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.2% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Houma and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (46.6% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 64.0%), single mother households (7.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 48.9%), and single father households (2.9% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 43.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.18 compared to 3.14, a difference of 1.2%), family households (65.7% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 3.6%), and currently married (45.5% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 6.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Houma and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (4.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 17.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (16.1% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 15.0%), and no vehicles in household (11.5% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.6% compared to 88.3%, a difference of 0.37%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.4% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 0.60%), and no vehicles in household (11.5% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Houma and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (2.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 162.6%), doctorate degree (0.96% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 146.6%), and master's degree (7.9% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 134.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (97.1% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.93%), 2nd grade (97.2% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.96%), and kindergarten (97.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.97%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Houma and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (18.7% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 87.5%), disability age 5 to 17 (9.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 74.2%), and vision disability (3.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 70.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (19.3% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 18.8%), disability age over 75 (56.2% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 24.5%), and self-care disability (3.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 26.7%).