Ugandan vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 70,865,330 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Czechoslovakia within Ugandan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.063. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ugandans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.010% in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ugandans corresponds to an increase of 9.7 Immigrants from Czechoslovakia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,047 compared to $51,770, a difference of 14.9%), wage/income gap (24.1% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 13.4%), and median male earnings ($55,290 compared to $62,217, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($40,889 compared to $43,571, a difference of 6.6%), householder income under 25 years ($50,923 compared to $54,352, a difference of 6.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,472 compared to $111,914, a difference of 8.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (12.2% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 27.0%), child poverty under the age of 16 (17.1% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 22.7%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (18.0% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 22.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.3% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 0.32%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 1.5%), and single male poverty (12.3% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (12.0% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 33.2%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 12.1%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.9% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.4% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 0.63%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.84%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.6% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.92%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 6.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.4% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.6% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 0.81%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.7% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.38%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.8% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.46%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 0.51%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 22.0%), single father households (2.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 13.9%), and currently married (44.2% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.75%), family households (61.7% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 2.8%), and average family size (3.23 compared to 3.14, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 3.9%), no vehicles in household (11.4% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 3.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.5% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.9% compared to 88.3%, a difference of 0.62%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 1.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.5% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 13.8%), no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 12.5%), and master's degree (17.1% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.24%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.24%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.24%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 18.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.3% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 13.6%), and cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (11.0% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 0.54%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.79%), and ambulatory disability (5.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 1.6%).