Pima vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 47,766,285 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Czechoslovakia within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.414. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.003% in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to an increase of 3.1 Immigrants from Czechoslovakia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,644 compared to $51,770, a difference of 68.9%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $111,914, a difference of 52.5%), and median household income ($63,262 compared to $95,319, a difference of 50.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $54,352, a difference of 5.5%), median female earnings ($35,326 compared to $43,571, a difference of 23.3%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,821 compared to $106,888, a difference of 29.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 148.9%), family poverty (18.4% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 139.5%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (25.3% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 108.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.8% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 9.7%), single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 41.1%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (28.4% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 48.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 160.5%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 122.9%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 109.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.7%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 9.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 22.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 15.7%), in labor force | age 25-29 (74.3% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 15.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (72.8% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 7.3%), in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 8.0%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 8.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 105.3%), births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 81.3%), and single mother households (8.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 55.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.1% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 3.4%), family households (65.9% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 4.0%), and divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 10.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 36.1%), no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 19.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 19.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 88.3%, a difference of 2.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 4.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 19.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (9.2% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 100.5%), bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 44.0%, a difference of 89.7%), and doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 79.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.010%), 3rd grade (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.010%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.020%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 83.9%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 65.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 61.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 12.7%), cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 15.9%), and male disability (12.8% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 17.7%).