Immigrants from South Eastern Asia vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from South Eastern Asia
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from South Eastern Asia

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia

Good
Excellent
6,462
SOCIAL INDEX
62.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
152nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,836
SOCIAL INDEX
85.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
45th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Integration in Immigrants from South Eastern Asia Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 193,285,569 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Czechoslovakia within Immigrant from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.001. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from South Eastern Asia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.000% in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from South Eastern Asia corresponds to a decrease of 0.0 Immigrants from Czechoslovakia.
Immigrants from South Eastern Asia Integration in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Communities

Immigrants from South Eastern Asia vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($43,539 compared to $51,770, a difference of 18.9%), median male earnings ($55,241 compared to $62,217, a difference of 12.6%), and wage/income gap (24.8% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($55,714 compared to $54,352, a difference of 2.5%), householder income over 65 years ($64,089 compared to $66,376, a difference of 3.6%), and median household income ($91,541 compared to $95,319, a difference of 4.1%).
Immigrants from South Eastern Asia vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Income
Income MetricImmigrants from South Eastern AsiaImmigrants from Czechoslovakia
Per Capita Income
Average
$43,539
Exceptional
$51,770
Median Family Income
Excellent
$106,252
Exceptional
$116,165
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$91,541
Exceptional
$95,319
Median Earnings
Excellent
$47,671
Exceptional
$52,361
Median Male Earnings
Good
$55,241
Exceptional
$62,217
Median Female Earnings
Excellent
$40,558
Exceptional
$43,571
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$55,714
Exceptional
$54,352
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$100,283
Exceptional
$106,888
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$106,109
Exceptional
$111,914
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$64,089
Exceptional
$66,376
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
24.8%
Tragic
27.3%

Immigrants from South Eastern Asia vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.1% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 14.9%), single father poverty (14.4% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 12.9%), and family poverty (8.5% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (27.1% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.88%), single female poverty (19.3% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 1.5%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.5% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 3.2%).
Immigrants from South Eastern Asia vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from South Eastern AsiaImmigrants from Czechoslovakia
Poverty
Excellent
11.7%
Exceptional
11.0%
Families
Excellent
8.5%
Exceptional
7.7%
Males
Excellent
10.6%
Exceptional
10.0%
Females
Excellent
12.7%
Exceptional
11.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
17.8%
Exceptional
19.1%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.5%
Exceptional
12.1%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.7%
Exceptional
14.8%
Children Under 16 years
Excellent
15.2%
Exceptional
13.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.2%
Exceptional
14.4%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.4%
Exceptional
14.2%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.4%
Exceptional
12.1%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.3%
Exceptional
19.0%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
14.4%
Good
16.2%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.1%
Exceptional
27.4%
Married Couples
Good
5.1%
Exceptional
4.6%
Seniors Over 65 years
Good
10.8%
Exceptional
10.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Average
12.2%
Excellent
11.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Excellent
11.1%
Exceptional
9.6%

Immigrants from South Eastern Asia vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.2% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 9.6%), female unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 6.8%), and unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.35%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.62%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.6% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.67%).
Immigrants from South Eastern Asia vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from South Eastern AsiaImmigrants from Czechoslovakia
Unemployment
Fair
5.3%
Exceptional
5.0%
Males
Fair
5.4%
Exceptional
5.1%
Females
Fair
5.4%
Exceptional
5.0%
Youth < 25
Average
11.6%
Good
11.5%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
17.1%
Fair
17.8%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Excellent
10.1%
Average
10.3%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Average
6.7%
Good
6.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Good
5.4%
Excellent
5.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Average
4.7%
Excellent
4.5%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Good
4.5%
Excellent
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Good
4.8%
Fair
4.8%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Poor
4.9%
Fair
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Excellent
5.3%
Good
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Good
5.1%
Good
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Excellent
8.5%
Exceptional
8.4%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.2%
Exceptional
7.0%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.2%
Fair
9.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.4%
Excellent
5.2%

Immigrants from South Eastern Asia vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.6% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 2.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.8% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 0.15%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.1% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 0.20%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.8% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.70%).
Immigrants from South Eastern Asia vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from South Eastern AsiaImmigrants from Czechoslovakia
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.9%
Poor
64.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Excellent
79.8%
Excellent
79.9%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Poor
35.6%
Average
36.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Average
75.1%
Average
75.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Poor
84.4%
Exceptional
85.4%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Average
84.7%
Exceptional
85.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Fair
84.2%
Exceptional
84.8%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Average
82.8%
Exceptional
83.4%

Immigrants from South Eastern Asia vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 18.5%), single mother households (6.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 18.3%), and family households with children (29.1% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (48.4% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 1.3%), divorced or separated (11.4% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 2.5%), and currently married (47.1% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 2.8%).
Immigrants from South Eastern Asia vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from South Eastern AsiaImmigrants from Czechoslovakia
Family Households
Exceptional
67.5%
Tragic
63.4%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
29.1%
Tragic
26.2%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.4%
Exceptional
47.8%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.36
Tragic
3.14
Single Father Households
Poor
2.4%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Average
6.3%
Exceptional
5.3%
Currently Married
Good
47.1%
Exceptional
48.4%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.4%
Exceptional
11.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Excellent
30.4%
Exceptional
28.4%

Immigrants from South Eastern Asia vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 42.3%), no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 37.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.1% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 25.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 88.3%, a difference of 3.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.6% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 10.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.1% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 25.0%).
Immigrants from South Eastern Asia vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from South Eastern AsiaImmigrants from Czechoslovakia
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.6%
Tragic
11.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.4%
Tragic
88.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.6%
Tragic
54.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
23.1%
Tragic
18.5%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.2%
Tragic
5.8%

Immigrants from South Eastern Asia vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.9% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 59.0%), professional degree (4.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 44.3%), and doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 37.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.1% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (97.1% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (97.1% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.1%).
Immigrants from South Eastern Asia vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from South Eastern AsiaImmigrants from Czechoslovakia
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.9%
Exceptional
1.8%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.1%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.1%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.1%
Exceptional
98.2%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Exceptional
98.1%
3rd Grade
Tragic
96.8%
Exceptional
98.0%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.5%
Exceptional
97.9%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.3%
Exceptional
97.7%
6th Grade
Tragic
95.9%
Exceptional
97.4%
7th Grade
Tragic
94.5%
Exceptional
96.6%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.2%
Exceptional
96.4%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.3%
Exceptional
95.7%
10th Grade
Tragic
92.1%
Exceptional
94.7%
11th Grade
Tragic
90.9%
Exceptional
93.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
89.6%
Exceptional
92.7%
High School Diploma
Tragic
87.2%
Exceptional
90.9%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
84.1%
Exceptional
87.9%
College, Under 1 year
Fair
64.5%
Exceptional
69.6%
College, 1 year or more
Fair
58.5%
Exceptional
64.1%
Associate's Degree
Fair
45.2%
Exceptional
51.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Fair
36.8%
Exceptional
44.0%
Master's Degree
Poor
14.0%
Exceptional
18.5%
Professional Degree
Tragic
4.0%
Exceptional
5.8%
Doctorate Degree
Poor
1.7%
Exceptional
2.4%

Immigrants from South Eastern Asia vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (23.3% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 11.1%), disability age over 75 (48.7% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 7.9%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (10.9% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 0.11%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 0.35%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.47%).
Immigrants from South Eastern Asia vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from South Eastern AsiaImmigrants from Czechoslovakia
Disability
Exceptional
11.3%
Exceptional
11.2%
Males
Excellent
10.9%
Excellent
10.9%
Females
Exceptional
11.7%
Exceptional
11.6%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Excellent
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.3%
Exceptional
6.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.6%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Average
23.3%
Exceptional
21.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.7%
Exceptional
45.1%
Vision
Excellent
2.1%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Good
3.0%
Poor
3.1%
Cognitive
Excellent
17.0%
Exceptional
16.2%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.9%
Exceptional
5.8%
Self-Care
Poor
2.5%
Exceptional
2.4%