German Russian vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 66,614,171 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Czechoslovakia within German Russian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.834. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in German Russians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.071% in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 German Russians corresponds to an increase of 70.7 Immigrants from Czechoslovakia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between German Russian and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($40,266 compared to $51,770, a difference of 28.6%), median household income ($75,856 compared to $95,319, a difference of 25.7%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($85,220 compared to $106,888, a difference of 25.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.6% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 10.7%), median female earnings ($37,105 compared to $43,571, a difference of 17.4%), and householder income under 25 years ($45,673 compared to $54,352, a difference of 19.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between German Russian and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.2% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 31.8%), child poverty under the age of 5 (18.8% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 27.2%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (17.8% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 25.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.3% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 4.7%), married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 8.1%), and single father poverty (17.7% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 9.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between German Russian and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.2% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 16.6%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.5% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 7.1%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.22%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.37%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.4% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 0.39%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between German Russian and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (42.4% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 16.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.5% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.14%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 0.29%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.46%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between German Russian and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 25.2%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 17.2%), and births to unmarried women (33.1% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.15 compared to 3.14, a difference of 0.13%), family households with children (26.8% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 2.3%), and divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between German Russian and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 20.7%), no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 11.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 88.3%, a difference of 1.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.6% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 2.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 10.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between German Russian and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 46.7%), master's degree (13.5% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 37.8%), and doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 33.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4th grade (97.9% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.0%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.010%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.010%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between German Russian and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 36.1%), disability age 35 to 64 (12.5% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 24.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 16.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 4.0%), disability age over 75 (47.3% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 4.8%), and hearing disability (3.3% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 5.2%).