Native Hawaiian vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 154,788,278 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Czechoslovakia within Native Hawaiian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.146. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Native Hawaiians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Native Hawaiians corresponds to an increase of 0.7 Immigrants from Czechoslovakia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($41,017 compared to $51,770, a difference of 26.2%), median male earnings ($52,306 compared to $62,217, a difference of 19.0%), and median earnings ($45,027 compared to $52,361, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($55,158 compared to $54,352, a difference of 1.5%), median household income ($89,919 compared to $95,319, a difference of 6.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($105,149 compared to $111,914, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (12.8% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 33.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 16.4%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (15.5% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 1.0%), single father poverty (15.7% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 3.0%), and single mother poverty (28.4% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 18.8%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.2% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 15.9%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.27%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.77%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.4% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 0.79%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 3.2%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.0% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 1.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.9% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 22.7%), births to unmarried women (34.3% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 20.8%), and single mother households (6.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.10%), currently married (47.9% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 0.97%), and married-couple households (49.1% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 62.5%), no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 53.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.9% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 35.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 88.3%, a difference of 4.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.4% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 13.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.9% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 35.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 53.0%), master's degree (12.3% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 51.1%), and doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 49.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (92.6% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 0.040%), high school diploma (90.8% compared to 90.9%, a difference of 0.040%), and 11th grade (93.9% compared to 93.8%, a difference of 0.16%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 18.5%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.7% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 17.0%), and disability age 65 to 74 (24.1% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.47%), cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 3.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.6% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 4.8%).