Luxembourger vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 92,991,009 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Czechoslovakia within Luxembourger communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.026. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Luxembourgers within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Luxembourgers corresponds to a decrease of 2.7 Immigrants from Czechoslovakia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,663 compared to $51,770, a difference of 13.4%), median male earnings ($56,300 compared to $62,217, a difference of 10.5%), and median household income ($86,418 compared to $95,319, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 0.57%), householder income under 25 years ($50,379 compared to $54,352, a difference of 7.9%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,536 compared to $111,914, a difference of 8.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 18.2%), single male poverty (13.4% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 10.5%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.9% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.34%), child poverty among girls under 16 (14.3% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 0.89%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (14.9% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 0.98%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.1% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 17.8%), unemployment (4.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 15.7%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.0% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.6%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 4.5%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (45.3% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 23.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (79.0% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 5.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.7% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (86.6% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 25-29 (86.9% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (86.4% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 9.7%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 4.4%), and births to unmarried women (29.4% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.3% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 0.23%), average family size (3.10 compared to 3.14, a difference of 1.3%), and married-couple households (48.5% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 120.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 14.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (94.8% compared to 88.3%, a difference of 7.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.1% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 9.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 13.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 26.1%), doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 22.0%), and master's degree (15.3% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 20.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.28%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.29%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.29%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 10.1%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.9% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 8.9%), and self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (11.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.27%), disability age over 75 (44.8% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 0.64%), and cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 1.0%).