Yugoslavian vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 148,014,534 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Czechoslovakia within Yugoslavian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.029. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Yugoslavians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Yugoslavians corresponds to a decrease of 1.8 Immigrants from Czechoslovakia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Yugoslavian and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($42,792 compared to $51,770, a difference of 21.0%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($91,368 compared to $106,888, a difference of 17.0%), and median family income ($100,119 compared to $116,165, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 2.1%), householder income under 25 years ($51,028 compared to $54,352, a difference of 6.5%), and median female earnings ($38,573 compared to $43,571, a difference of 13.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Yugoslavian and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (17.2% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 16.2%), child poverty among girls under 16 (16.2% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 14.4%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (15.8% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.0% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 0.16%), single father poverty (16.3% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 0.41%), and married-couple family poverty (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Yugoslavian and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.6% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 13.6%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 10.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.6%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Yugoslavian and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.8% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 14.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.0% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 0.97%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.9% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.10%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 0.20%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.6% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.20%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Yugoslavian and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 15.5%), single mother households (6.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 15.3%), and births to unmarried women (30.8% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.15 compared to 3.14, a difference of 0.14%), family households (63.1% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 0.55%), and currently married (47.2% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Yugoslavian and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 31.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 8.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.1% compared to 88.3%, a difference of 3.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 4.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Yugoslavian and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 41.7%), doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 36.4%), and master's degree (14.4% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 29.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (95.7% compared to 95.7%, a difference of 0.0%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.020%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.020%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Yugoslavian and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 18.9%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.7% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 17.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.8% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 3.7%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 5.4%), and cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 5.9%).