Ethiopian vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 125,242,038 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Czechoslovakia within Ethiopian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.101. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ethiopians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ethiopians corresponds to an increase of 1.1 Immigrants from Czechoslovakia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (21.8% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 24.9%), per capita income ($46,569 compared to $51,770, a difference of 11.2%), and median male earnings ($56,243 compared to $62,217, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($43,243 compared to $43,571, a difference of 0.76%), householder income under 25 years ($53,818 compared to $54,352, a difference of 0.99%), and householder income over 65 years ($64,989 compared to $66,376, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (13.5% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 19.6%), child poverty under the age of 16 (16.3% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 17.4%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (16.5% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.99%), single mother poverty (27.7% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 1.4%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.4% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 8.1%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.5% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 8.1%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.1% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.8% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 0.010%), male unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.080%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 0.15%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (69.3% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 7.0%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.2% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (86.2% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.88%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.9% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (86.6% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 22.0%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 18.4%), and married-couple households (43.2% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 2.8%), average family size (3.24 compared to 3.14, a difference of 3.0%), and family households (61.2% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 12.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.9% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 3.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.1% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 0.010%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 88.3%, a difference of 1.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.1% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 33.2%), professional degree (5.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 8.7%), and master's degree (18.0% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.55%), nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.62%), and kindergarten (97.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.62%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 16.5%), cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 10.6%), and ambulatory disability (5.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 0.89%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 2.3%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.5%).