Immigrants from Nepal vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Nepal
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Nepal

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia

Good
Excellent
7,773
SOCIAL INDEX
75.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
106th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,836
SOCIAL INDEX
85.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
45th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Integration in Immigrants from Nepal Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 110,643,765 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Czechoslovakia within Immigrant from Nepal communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.187. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Nepal within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.013% in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Nepal corresponds to an increase of 13.3 Immigrants from Czechoslovakia.
Immigrants from Nepal Integration in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Communities

Immigrants from Nepal vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nepal and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($44,187 compared to $51,770, a difference of 17.2%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,322 compared to $106,888, a difference of 12.1%), and median male earnings ($55,615 compared to $62,217, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,611 compared to $54,352, a difference of 3.3%), median female earnings ($40,704 compared to $43,571, a difference of 7.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,843 compared to $66,376, a difference of 7.3%).
Immigrants from Nepal vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Income
Income MetricImmigrants from NepalImmigrants from Czechoslovakia
Per Capita Income
Good
$44,187
Exceptional
$51,770
Median Family Income
Good
$104,966
Exceptional
$116,165
Median Household Income
Good
$87,046
Exceptional
$95,319
Median Earnings
Excellent
$47,925
Exceptional
$52,361
Median Male Earnings
Good
$55,615
Exceptional
$62,217
Median Female Earnings
Excellent
$40,704
Exceptional
$43,571
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Good
$52,611
Exceptional
$54,352
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Good
$95,322
Exceptional
$106,888
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Good
$102,190
Exceptional
$111,914
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Good
$61,843
Exceptional
$66,376
Wage/Income Gap
Excellent
24.9%
Tragic
27.3%

Immigrants from Nepal vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nepal and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 16 (15.7% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 13.0%), child poverty under the age of 5 (16.6% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 12.4%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (15.9% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.42%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.1% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 0.58%), and single male poverty (11.9% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 1.8%).
Immigrants from Nepal vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from NepalImmigrants from Czechoslovakia
Poverty
Good
12.2%
Exceptional
11.0%
Families
Excellent
8.5%
Exceptional
7.7%
Males
Good
11.0%
Exceptional
10.0%
Females
Good
13.3%
Exceptional
11.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
20.7%
Exceptional
19.1%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.8%
Exceptional
12.1%
Children Under 5 years
Excellent
16.6%
Exceptional
14.8%
Children Under 16 years
Good
15.7%
Exceptional
13.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Good
15.9%
Exceptional
14.4%
Girls Under 16 years
Good
15.9%
Exceptional
14.2%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.9%
Exceptional
12.1%
Single Females
Exceptional
20.3%
Exceptional
19.0%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
14.8%
Good
16.2%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.9%
Exceptional
27.4%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.6%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Exceptional
10.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Excellent
11.8%
Excellent
11.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.6%
Exceptional
9.6%

Immigrants from Nepal vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nepal and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (5.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 15.0%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 12.6%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.3% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 1.1%), female unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 2.1%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 3.1%).
Immigrants from Nepal vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from NepalImmigrants from Czechoslovakia
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
5.0%
Males
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
5.1%
Females
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
5.0%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.8%
Good
11.5%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.3%
Fair
17.8%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.4%
Average
10.3%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
5.7%
Good
6.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Excellent
5.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Excellent
4.5%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Excellent
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Fair
4.8%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Fair
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.9%
Good
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.7%
Good
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.3%
Exceptional
8.4%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.8%
Exceptional
7.0%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.3%
Fair
9.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.1%
Excellent
5.2%

Immigrants from Nepal vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nepal and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (68.0% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 5.1%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (81.1% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.29%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.8% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.44%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.3% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.56%).
Immigrants from Nepal vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from NepalImmigrants from Czechoslovakia
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
68.0%
Poor
64.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
81.1%
Excellent
79.9%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.3%
Average
36.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.0%
Average
75.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.8%
Exceptional
85.4%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.6%
Exceptional
85.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.3%
Exceptional
84.8%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
84.0%
Exceptional
83.4%

Immigrants from Nepal vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nepal and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 20.4%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 9.8%), and family households with children (28.4% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.7% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 1.2%), divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 1.2%), and average family size (3.21 compared to 3.14, a difference of 2.0%).
Immigrants from Nepal vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from NepalImmigrants from Czechoslovakia
Family Households
Tragic
62.7%
Tragic
63.4%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.4%
Tragic
26.2%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
45.2%
Exceptional
47.8%
Average Family Size
Poor
3.21
Tragic
3.14
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Fair
6.4%
Exceptional
5.3%
Currently Married
Fair
46.1%
Exceptional
48.4%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.6%
Exceptional
11.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
29.6%
Exceptional
28.4%

Immigrants from Nepal vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nepal and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 12.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.6% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 4.8%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (53.5% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 1.1%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.5% compared to 88.3%, a difference of 1.4%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 3.8%).
Immigrants from Nepal vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from NepalImmigrants from Czechoslovakia
No Vehicles Available
Average
10.5%
Tragic
11.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Fair
89.5%
Tragic
88.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
53.5%
Tragic
54.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
17.6%
Tragic
18.5%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.6%
Tragic
5.8%

Immigrants from Nepal vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nepal and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 25.2%), professional degree (4.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 21.6%), and master's degree (17.0% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.7% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.51%), kindergarten (97.7% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.51%), and 1st grade (97.7% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.51%).
Immigrants from Nepal vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from NepalImmigrants from Czechoslovakia
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.3%
Exceptional
1.8%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.7%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.7%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.7%
Exceptional
98.2%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.6%
Exceptional
98.1%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.5%
Exceptional
98.0%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
97.9%
5th Grade
Poor
97.1%
Exceptional
97.7%
6th Grade
Poor
96.8%
Exceptional
97.4%
7th Grade
Fair
95.9%
Exceptional
96.6%
8th Grade
Fair
95.6%
Exceptional
96.4%
9th Grade
Fair
94.8%
Exceptional
95.7%
10th Grade
Average
93.7%
Exceptional
94.7%
11th Grade
Fair
92.4%
Exceptional
93.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Average
91.2%
Exceptional
92.7%
High School Diploma
Good
89.3%
Exceptional
90.9%
GED/Equivalency
Good
86.2%
Exceptional
87.9%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
67.5%
Exceptional
69.6%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.0%
Exceptional
64.1%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
49.5%
Exceptional
51.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
41.7%
Exceptional
44.0%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
17.0%
Exceptional
18.5%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
5.8%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.2%
Exceptional
2.4%

Immigrants from Nepal vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nepal and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 14.8%), disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 14.5%), and cognitive disability (18.0% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 0.11%), female disability (11.3% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 2.9%), and disability age over 75 (46.6% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 3.3%).
Immigrants from Nepal vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from NepalImmigrants from Czechoslovakia
Disability
Exceptional
10.8%
Exceptional
11.2%
Males
Exceptional
10.3%
Excellent
10.9%
Females
Exceptional
11.3%
Exceptional
11.6%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.0%
Excellent
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Good
5.5%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.3%
Exceptional
6.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.6%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Excellent
22.6%
Exceptional
21.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.6%
Exceptional
45.1%
Vision
Exceptional
1.9%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.7%
Poor
3.1%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.0%
Exceptional
16.2%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.4%
Exceptional
5.8%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.2%
Exceptional
2.4%